Skip to content

PJUL vs PSMJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PJULCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.30pt a year

PJUL0.79%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PJUL 16.5×the volume

PJUL109KPSMJ6.64K

5Y return · a year

PSMJ +0.1pt

PJUL+10.1%PSMJ+10.2%

PJUL vs PSMJ Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+62.0%PJUL+62.4%PSMJ

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. PJUL +62.0%. PSMJ +62.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%30%40%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PJUL 0.79%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
PJUL $1.29B
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
PJUL +7.7%
PSMJ +7.9%, better
Yield (12M)
PJUL 0.00%
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
PJUL 3
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
PJUL 109K sh, better
PSMJ 6.64K sh
NAV per share
PJUL $49.56
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PJUL: Cost 35, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings not scored, Durability 88. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for PJUL, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPJULPSMJ
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC47C47
Tradability15% weightB67HigherC50
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA88HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PJUL and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and PJUL 13th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 11CTENMiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 13CPJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 14CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PJULCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

PJUL Rides the S&P 500, absorbs the first 15% of a 12-month drawdown, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. Innovator's July-reset Power Buffer, running the same playbook since 2018.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

PJUL The Fund seeks to track the return of SPY up to a predetermined cap while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • PJUL The buffer is the whole product: built to absorb the first 15% of reference-index losses across each one-year outcome period, with upside capped in return.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades tightly for a defined-outcome fund, and at multi-billion-dollar size it is one of the more established names on the buffer shelf.
  • A 2018 vintage that has carried its buffer through real market cycles, and among buffer funds we grade it sits near the top of the group.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PJUL Cap and buffer are set at the July 1 reset and apply to full-period holders. Step in midstream and your effective cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% is the category median, not the floor. The laddered sibling BUFF lists 0.10% and spreads the same Power Buffer approach across staggered start dates.
  • Income is not part of the design. The options-based structure has not been throwing off distributions.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full PJUL profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

PJUL vs PSMJ Holdings

How PJUL and PSMJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PJUL and 0.0% of PSMJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in PJUL and PSMJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in PJULMore in PSMJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PJUL and PSMJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in PJULMore in PSMJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PJUL102.9%
  • PSMJ102.8%

Securities held

  • PJUL3
  • PSMJ2

Asset class

PJUL
Equity
PSMJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PJUL3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMJ2

Only in PJUL

3 securities, 100% of PJUL by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 7.47 C98.40%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P4.24%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.30%

Only in PSMJ

2 securities, 100% of PSMJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.29 C98.14%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.03%

Weight gaps

PJUL and PSMJ share no securities.

All 6 PJUL holdings⁠All 6 PSMJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PJUL vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying PJUL vs PSMJ

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PJUL 0.79%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PJUL $15,174PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearPJULPSMJOverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PJUL
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PJUL 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PJUL vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
PJUL 0.00%
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
PJUL None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2021, same scale for both

PJUL1 paymentAll PJUL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2019 to 2021. Nov 19, 2019 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252021
PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2019 to 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252021

PJUL vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PJUL
  • PSMJ
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PSMJ −10.9% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PJUL 6.3%PSMJ 6.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PJUL 1.44PSMJ 1.47, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PJUL −10.7%, betterPSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PJUL 0.47PSMJ 0.47Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • PJULCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJULCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJULCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.