BUFC ranks 4th and PMAR 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs PMAR
BUFC −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
BUFC 2.6×the volume
49.5K19K
BUFC vs PMAR Performance
+5.8%+10.5%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- PMAR 0.79%
- BUFC $1.11B
- PMAR $742M
- BUFC +5.8%
- PMAR +10.5%, better
- BUFC 4
- PMAR 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh, better
- PMAR 19K sh
- BUFC $43.25
- PMAR $48.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | PMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74 | A81Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and PMAR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
PMARC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
PMAR The March-start link in Innovator's twelve-month buffer chain: it follows the big S&P 500 ETF up to a cap and is built to absorb the first 15% of losses over each March-to-February outcome period.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
PMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs PMAR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs PMAR Cost
Overpaying PMAR vs BUFC
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
PMAR 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | PMAR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.79%PMAR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PMAR 24th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs PMAR Dividends
- BUFC None
- PMAR None
Distribution history
BUFC vs PMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%PMAR 5.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82PMAR 1.52
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%PMAR −10.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26PMAR 0.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.