Skip to content

PMAR vs PSMJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March

PMARCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.30pt a year

PMAR0.79%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PMAR 2.9×the volume

PMAR19KPSMJ6.64K

5Y return · a year

PSMJ +1.0pt

PMAR+9.3%PSMJ+10.3%

PMAR vs PSMJ Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+56.1%PMAR+63.1%PSMJ

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PMAR +56.1%. PSMJ +63.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PMAR 0.79%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
PMAR $742M
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
PMAR +10.5%, better
PSMJ +8.2%
Yield (12M)
PMAR No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
PMAR 3
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
PMAR 19K sh, better
PSMJ 6.64K sh
NAV per share
PMAR $48.93
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PMAR: Cost 35, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for PMAR, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPMARPSMJ
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB61HigherC46
Tradability15% weightC48C50Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PMAR and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and PMAR 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 16CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 47
  5. Rank 16CPMARInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  6. Rank 19CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PMARCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

PMAR The March-start link in Innovator's twelve-month buffer chain: it follows the big S&P 500 ETF up to a cap and is built to absorb the first 15% of losses over each March-to-February outcome period.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

PMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • PMAR The deal is written into the fund's terms: absorb SPY's first 15% of losses over an outcome period, give up gains above a cap in exchange.innovatoretfs.com
  • Fixed calendar. The outcome period runs March 1 to the end of February, then the cap resets under the same rules, so you always know when the terms change.innovatoretfs.com
  • A registered 1940 Act fund, not a bank-issued note, at a 0.79% expense ratio that lands right on the buffer-fund median.
  • Sits in the upper half of its buffer-fund peer group, one of the more solid takes on the defined-outcome playbook.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PMAR Buy mid-period and you get whatever buffer and upside are left, not the headline 15% and the full cap. The stated terms describe a complete March-to-February run.
  • 0.79% is the going rate in this cohort and well above plain S&P 500 exposure. The options sleeve that builds the buffer is what you're paying for.
  • Trades lightly, so spreads can widen; limit orders are the usual workaround. It also makes no regular distributions, so any return shows up in the share price.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full PMAR profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

PMAR vs PSMJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PMAR vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying PMAR vs PSMJ

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PMAR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PMAR 0.79%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PMAR $15,174PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearPMARPSMJOverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PMAR
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PMAR 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PMAR vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PMAR No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
PMAR None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

PMARAll PMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

PMAR vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PMAR
  • PSMJ
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PMAR −10.8% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PMAR 5.8%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PMAR 1.52, betterPSMJ 1.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PMAR −10.8%, betterPSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PMAR 0.43PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • PMARCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMARCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMARCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.