PSMJ ranks 2nd and PMAR 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PMAR vs PSMJ
PSMJ −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PMAR 2.9×the volume
19K6.64K
PSMJ +1.0pt
+9.3%+10.3%
PMAR vs PSMJ Performance
+56.1%+63.1%
- PMAR 0.79%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- PMAR $742M
- PSMJ $108M
- PMAR +10.5%, better
- PSMJ +8.2%
- PMAR
- PSMJ 0.00%
- PMAR 3
- PSMJ 3
- PMAR 19K sh, better
- PSMJ 6.64K sh
- PMAR $48.93
- PSMJ $34.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PMAR | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | C48 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | B63 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PMAR and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PMARC
PSMJB
In short
PMAR The March-start link in Innovator's twelve-month buffer chain: it follows the big S&P 500 ETF up to a cap and is built to absorb the first 15% of losses over each March-to-February outcome period.
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
Stated mandate
PMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PMAR vs PSMJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PMAR vs PSMJ Cost
Overpaying PMAR vs PSMJ
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PMAR 0.79%
$15,174
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PMAR | PSMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%PMAR
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PMAR 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PMAR vs PSMJ Dividends
- PMAR
- PSMJ 0.00%
- PMAR None
- PSMJ None
Distribution history
PMAR vs PSMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PMAR
- PSMJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PMAR 5.8%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- PMAR 1.52, betterPSMJ 1.47
- Worst fall
- PMAR −10.8%, betterPSMJ −10.9%
- Market sensitivity
- PMAR 0.43PSMJ 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.