Skip to content

BUFC vs PSTP

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

PSTPFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.20pt a year

BUFC0.69%PSTP0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 6.8×the volume

BUFC48.2KPSTP7.13K

BUFC vs PSTP Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+5.9%BUFC+7.3%PSTP

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BUFC +5.9%. PSTP +7.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
PSTP 0.89%
Fund size
BUFC $1.09B
PSTP $130M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.9%
PSTP +7.3%, better
Holdings
BUFC 5
PSTP 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 48.2K sh, better
PSTP 7.13K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $42.98
PSTP $36.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PSTP: Cost 0, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PSTP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPSTP
Cost30% weightB57HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC47HigherD36
Tradability15% weightB60HigherC53
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74HigherB60

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PSTP are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and PSTP 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5BPSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 49DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 36
  7. Rank 50FPSTPInnovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETFScore 25
  8. SQBANot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PSTPFInnovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PSTP Most buffer ETFs hand you one reset date a year and wish you luck. PSTP is checked monthly and can step its protection up to a higher level after a rally, with one-year FLEX options doing the work behind a single ticker.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PSTP PSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through an opportunistically managed, monthly evaluated buffer strategy. It uses one-year FLEX options and may also invest directly in SPY or its components, subject to an upside limit and downside-loss protection.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PSTP The step-up idea: the buffer is evaluated monthly rather than parked on one annual reset date, so a rally can lift the level the protection is measured from.innovatoretfs.com
  • One ticker, no calendar homework. The reset timing is managed inside the fund instead of you laddering a shelf of dated January-through-December series.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference is SPY itself, and the fund can hold SPY or its components directly alongside the one-year FLEX options rather than tracking a synthetic proxy.innovatoretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PSTP Active management costs: 0.89% a year, above the 0.79% median for S&P 500 buffer funds and above Innovator's own dated Power Buffer series such as PMAY.
  • The cushion is bought with your upside: gains are capped, and anyone buying mid-period inherits whatever cap and remaining buffer exist that day, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading is light next to the category's household names, so spreads can widen, and the options package has not been throwing off distributions.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PSTP profile⁠

BUFC vs PSTP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PSTP Cost

Overpaying PSTP vs BUFC

$3,443

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PSTP 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PSTP 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PSTP $16,872BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCPSTPOverpaying
10$1,232$1,576$344
20$4,697$5,953$1,256
30$13,429$16,872$3,443

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.89%PSTP
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

PSTP 51st cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PSTP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PSTP None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSTPAll PSTP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs PSTP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PSTP 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PSTP 1.25
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PSTP −12.5%since Mar 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PSTP 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsPSMOB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsPSMJB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsPSMRB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.