BUFC ranks 4th and PSTP 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs PSTP
BUFC −0.20pt a year
0.69%0.89%
BUFC 6.8×the volume
48.2K7.13K
BUFC vs PSTP Performance
+5.9%+7.3%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- PSTP 0.89%
- BUFC $1.09B
- PSTP $130M
- BUFC +5.9%
- PSTP +7.3%, better
- BUFC 5
- PSTP 3
- BUFC 48.2K sh, better
- PSTP 7.13K sh
- BUFC $42.98
- PSTP $36.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | PSTP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | F0 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B60Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | B60 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and PSTP are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
PSTPF
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
PSTP Most buffer ETFs hand you one reset date a year and wish you luck. PSTP is checked monthly and can step its protection up to a higher level after a rally, with one-year FLEX options doing the work behind a single ticker.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
PSTP PSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through an opportunistically managed, monthly evaluated buffer strategy. It uses one-year FLEX options and may also invest directly in SPY or its components, subject to an upside limit and downside-loss protection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs PSTP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs PSTP Cost
Overpaying PSTP vs BUFC
$3,443
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
PSTP 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | PSTP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,576 | $344 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,953 | $1,256 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $16,872 | $3,443 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.89%PSTP
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PSTP 51st cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs PSTP Dividends
- BUFC None
- PSTP None
Distribution history
BUFC vs PSTP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%PSTP 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82PSTP 1.25
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%PSTP −12.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26PSTP 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.