Skip to content

PSMO vs PSTP

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

PSTPFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.40pt a year

PSMO0.49%PSTP0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMO 1.1×the volume

PSMO8.14KPSTP7.13K

3Y return · a year

PSMO +0.3pt

PSMO+11.8%PSTP+11.5%

PSMO vs PSTP Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+10.5%PSMO+7.3%PSTP

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. PSMO +10.5%. PSTP +7.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PSMO 0.49%, better
PSTP 0.89%
Fund size
PSMO $117M
PSTP $130M
1Y total return
PSMO +10.5%, better
PSTP +7.3%
Holdings
PSMO 3
PSTP 3
Avg volume (30D)
PSMO 8.14K sh, better
PSTP 7.13K sh
NAV per share
PSMO $32.98
PSTP $36.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 47, Mission 95, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. PSTP: Cost 0, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSMO, PSTP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSMOPSTP
Cost30% weightA70HigherF0
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightC47HigherD36
Tradability15% weightB66HigherC53
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66HigherB60

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSMO and PSTP are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and PSTP 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 49DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 36
  4. Rank 50FPSTPInnovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETFScore 25
  5. SQBANot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSTPFInnovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

In short

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

PSTP Most buffer ETFs hand you one reset date a year and wish you luck. PSTP is checked monthly and can step its protection up to a higher level after a rally, with one-year FLEX options doing the work behind a single ticker.

Stated mandate

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

PSTP PSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through an opportunistically managed, monthly evaluated buffer strategy. It uses one-year FLEX options and may also invest directly in SPY or its components, subject to an upside limit and downside-loss protection.

Why people hold it

  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com
  • PSTP The step-up idea: the buffer is evaluated monthly rather than parked on one annual reset date, so a rally can lift the level the protection is measured from.innovatoretfs.com
  • One ticker, no calendar homework. The reset timing is managed inside the fund instead of you laddering a shelf of dated January-through-December series.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference is SPY itself, and the fund can hold SPY or its components directly alongside the one-year FLEX options rather than tracking a synthetic proxy.innovatoretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • PSTP Active management costs: 0.89% a year, above the 0.79% median for S&P 500 buffer funds and above Innovator's own dated Power Buffer series such as PMAY.
  • The cushion is bought with your upside: gains are capped, and anyone buying mid-period inherits whatever cap and remaining buffer exist that day, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading is light next to the category's household names, so spreads can widen, and the options package has not been throwing off distributions.

Full PSMO profile⁠

Full PSTP profile⁠

PSMO vs PSTP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSMO vs PSTP Cost

Overpaying PSTP vs PSMO

$7,080

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

  • PSTP 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSMO 0.49%
  • PSTP 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PSTP $16,872PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPSMOPSTPOverpaying
10$883$1,576$693
20$3,394$5,953$2,559
30$9,792$16,872$7,080

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • 0.89%PSTP
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PSTP 51st cheapest of 51 funds

PSMO vs PSTP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSMO None
PSTP None

Distribution history

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSTPAll PSTP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMO vs PSTP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSMO 5.9%PSTP 5.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSMO 1.31, betterPSTP 1.25
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSMO −9.8%PSTP −12.5%since Mar 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSMO 0.41PSTP 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsPSMJB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsPSMRB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsBUFCB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.