PSMO ranks 1st and PSTP 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PSMO vs PSTP
PSMO −0.40pt a year
0.49%0.89%
PSMO 1.1×the volume
8.14K7.13K
PSMO +0.3pt
+11.8%+11.5%
PSMO vs PSTP Performance
+10.5%+7.3%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- PSTP 0.89%
- PSMO $117M
- PSTP $130M
- PSMO +10.5%, better
- PSTP +7.3%
- PSMO 3
- PSTP 3
- PSMO 8.14K sh, better
- PSTP 7.13K sh
- PSMO $32.98
- PSTP $36.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSMO | PSTP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B60 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PSMO and PSTP are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSMOB
PSTPF
In short
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
PSTP Most buffer ETFs hand you one reset date a year and wish you luck. PSTP is checked monthly and can step its protection up to a higher level after a rally, with one-year FLEX options doing the work behind a single ticker.
Stated mandate
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
PSTP PSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through an opportunistically managed, monthly evaluated buffer strategy. It uses one-year FLEX options and may also invest directly in SPY or its components, subject to an upside limit and downside-loss protection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSMO vs PSTP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSMO vs PSTP Cost
Overpaying PSTP vs PSMO
$7,080
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
PSTP 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSMO | PSTP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,576 | $693 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $5,953 | $2,559 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $16,872 | $7,080 |
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- 0.89%PSTP
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PSTP 51st cheapest of 51 funds
PSMO vs PSTP Dividends
- PSMO None
- PSTP None
Distribution history
PSMO vs PSTP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSMO 5.9%PSTP 5.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- PSMO 1.31, betterPSTP 1.25
- Worst fall
- PSMO −9.8%PSTP −12.5%
- Market sensitivity
- PSMO 0.41PSTP 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.