Skip to content

PSMJ vs PSTP

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

PSTPFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.40pt a year

PSMJ0.49%PSTP0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

PSTP 1.2×the volume

PSMJ5.98KPSTP7.13K

3Y return · a year

PSMJ +2.1pt

PSMJ+13.6%PSTP+11.5%

PSMJ vs PSTP Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+8.5%PSMJ+7.3%PSTP

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. PSMJ +8.5%. PSTP +7.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PSMJ 0.49%, better
PSTP 0.89%
Fund size
PSMJ $106M
PSTP $130M
1Y total return
PSMJ +8.5%, better
PSTP +7.3%
Yield (12M)
PSMJ 0.00%
PSTP No data
Holdings
PSMJ 3
PSTP 3
Avg volume (30D)
PSMJ 5.98K sh
PSTP 7.13K sh, better
NAV per share
PSMJ $33.87
PSTP $36.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 64. PSTP: Cost 0, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSMJ, PSTP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSMJPSTP
Cost30% weightA70HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53HigherD36
Tradability15% weightC48C53Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB64HigherB60

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSMJ and PSTP are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and PSTP 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 49DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 36
  5. Rank 50FPSTPInnovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETFScore 25
  6. SQBANot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSTPFInnovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

In short

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

PSTP Most buffer ETFs hand you one reset date a year and wish you luck. PSTP is checked monthly and can step its protection up to a higher level after a rally, with one-year FLEX options doing the work behind a single ticker.

Stated mandate

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

PSTP PSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through an opportunistically managed, monthly evaluated buffer strategy. It uses one-year FLEX options and may also invest directly in SPY or its components, subject to an upside limit and downside-loss protection.

Why people hold it

  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com
  • PSTP The step-up idea: the buffer is evaluated monthly rather than parked on one annual reset date, so a rally can lift the level the protection is measured from.innovatoretfs.com
  • One ticker, no calendar homework. The reset timing is managed inside the fund instead of you laddering a shelf of dated January-through-December series.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference is SPY itself, and the fund can hold SPY or its components directly alongside the one-year FLEX options rather than tracking a synthetic proxy.innovatoretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com
  • PSTP Active management costs: 0.89% a year, above the 0.79% median for S&P 500 buffer funds and above Innovator's own dated Power Buffer series such as PMAY.
  • The cushion is bought with your upside: gains are capped, and anyone buying mid-period inherits whatever cap and remaining buffer exist that day, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading is light next to the category's household names, so spreads can widen, and the options package has not been throwing off distributions.

Full PSMJ profile⁠

Full PSTP profile⁠

PSMJ vs PSTP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSMJ vs PSTP Cost

Overpaying PSTP vs PSMJ

$7,080

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

  • PSTP 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • PSTP 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PSTP $16,872PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearPSMJPSTPOverpaying
10$883$1,576$693
20$3,394$5,953$2,559
30$9,792$16,872$7,080

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • 0.89%PSTP
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PSTP 51st cheapest of 51 funds

PSMJ vs PSTP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
PSMJ 0.00%
PSTP No data
Payout (12M)
PSMJ None
PSTP None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021
PSTPAll PSTP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ vs PSTP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSMJ 6.3%PSTP 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSMJ 1.47, betterPSTP 1.25
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSMJ −10.9%PSTP −12.5%since Mar 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSMJ 0.47PSTP 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsPSMOB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsPSMRB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSTPFvsBUFCB

    Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.