BUFC ranks 4th and SPBU 46th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs SPBU
BUFC −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.79%
BUFC 1.6×the volume
49.5K31.9K
BUFC vs SPBU Performance
+5.8%+6.7%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- SPBU 0.79%
- BUFC $1.11B
- SPBU $202M
- BUFC +5.8%
- SPBU +6.7%, better
- BUFC 4
- SPBU 12
- BUFC 49.5K sh, better
- SPBU 31.9K sh
- BUFC $43.25
- SPBU $30.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | SPBU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41Higher | F9 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A87 | |
| Durability | A74Higher | C43 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and SPBU are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
SPBUD
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
SPBU Most buffer ETFs cap your upside. SPBU skips the ceiling: its twelve underlying funds take a stated spread off the S&P 500 ETF's return instead, while buffering the first 15% of losses. Laddered monthly, so no single start date defines your year.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
SPBU The Fund seeks to achieve its objective through a laddered portfolio of twelve AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETFs. The underlying strategy seeks to track SPY market-price returns over specified one-year periods while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses, subject to a stated spread.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs SPBU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs SPBU Cost
Overpaying SPBU vs BUFC
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
SPBU 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | SPBU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,405 | $173 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,331 | $634 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $15,174 | $1,745 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.79%SPBU
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
SPBU 24th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs SPBU Dividends
- BUFC None
- SPBU None
Distribution history
BUFC vs SPBU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%SPBU 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82SPBU 1.13
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%SPBU −8.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26SPBU 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.