Skip to content

PSMJ vs SPBU

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF

SPBUDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.30pt a year

PSMJ0.49%SPBU0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

SPBU 4.8×the volume

PSMJ6.64KSPBU31.9K

PSMJ vs SPBU Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.2%PSMJ+6.7%SPBU

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PSMJ +8.2%. SPBU +6.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSMJ 0.49%, better
SPBU 0.79%
Fund size
PSMJ $108M
SPBU $202M
1Y total return
PSMJ +8.2%, better
SPBU +6.7%
Yield (12M)
PSMJ 0.00%
SPBU No data
Holdings
PSMJ 3
SPBU 12
Avg volume (30D)
PSMJ 6.64K sh
SPBU 31.9K sh, better
NAV per share
PSMJ $34.43
SPBU $30.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63. SPBU: Cost 35, Risk 9, Mission not scored, Tradability 44, Holdings 87, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSMJ, SPBU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSMJSPBU
Cost30% weightA70HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC46HigherF9
Tradability15% weightC50HigherC44
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA87
Durability5% weightB63HigherC43

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSMJ and SPBU are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and SPBU 46th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 46DJNEUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jun ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 46DSPBUAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETFScore 38
  6. Rank 48DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

SPBUDAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF

In short

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

SPBU Most buffer ETFs cap your upside. SPBU skips the ceiling: its twelve underlying funds take a stated spread off the S&P 500 ETF's return instead, while buffering the first 15% of losses. Laddered monthly, so no single start date defines your year.

Stated mandate

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

SPBU The Fund seeks to achieve its objective through a laddered portfolio of twelve AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETFs. The underlying strategy seeks to track SPY market-price returns over specified one-year periods while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses, subject to a stated spread.

Why people hold it

  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com
  • SPBU No upside cap. The underlying Buffer15 Uncapped funds subtract a stated spread from the S&P 500 ETF's one-year return rather than stopping gains at a ceiling.
  • Twelve overlapping one-year outcome periods in one ticket, so the portfolio staggers its resets instead of hanging on a single entry date.
  • The 15% buffer is written into the design: the underlying strategy absorbs the first 15% of S&P 500 ETF losses over each one-year period.
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits right at the median for its buffered S&P 500 peer group, so the uncapped twist costs no premium over standard capped 15% buffers.

Worth knowing

  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com
  • SPBU The spread is what you pay for no cap. Upside arrives as the index return minus that stated spread, so the fund trails plain S&P 500 exposure in strong years.
  • Cost isn't the edge here. Another laddered buffer fund in the same group, BUFF, charges 0.10% at the fund level.
  • Launched in 2025 and thinly traded, so the track record is short and the gap between bid and ask can matter as much as the expense ratio.

Full PSMJ profile⁠

Full SPBU profile⁠

PSMJ vs SPBU Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSMJ vs SPBU Cost

Overpaying SPBU vs PSMJ

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

  • SPBU 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • SPBU 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SPBU $15,174PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearPSMJSPBUOverpaying
10$883$1,405$522
20$3,394$5,331$1,937
30$9,792$15,174$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • 0.79%SPBU
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

SPBU 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PSMJ vs SPBU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PSMJ 0.00%
SPBU No data
Payout (12M)
PSMJ None
SPBU None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021
SPBUAll SPBU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ vs SPBU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSMJ 6.3%SPBU 9.0%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSMJ 1.47SPBU 1.13since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSMJ −10.9%SPBU −8.3%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSMJ 0.47SPBU 0.75

Popular comparisons

  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPBUDvsPSMOB

    AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPBUDvsPSMRB

    AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPBUDvsBUFCB

    AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.