PSMJ ranks 2nd and SPBU 46th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PSMJ vs SPBU
PSMJ −0.30pt a year
0.49%0.79%
SPBU 4.8×the volume
6.64K31.9K
PSMJ vs SPBU Performance
+8.2%+6.7%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- SPBU 0.79%
- PSMJ $108M
- SPBU $202M
- PSMJ +8.2%, better
- SPBU +6.7%
- PSMJ 0.00%
- SPBU
- PSMJ 3
- SPBU 12
- PSMJ 6.64K sh
- SPBU 31.9K sh, better
- PSMJ $34.43
- SPBU $30.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSMJ | SPBU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46Higher | F9 |
| Tradability | C50Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A87 | |
| Durability | B63Higher | C43 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PSMJ and SPBU are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSMJB
SPBUD
In short
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
SPBU Most buffer ETFs cap your upside. SPBU skips the ceiling: its twelve underlying funds take a stated spread off the S&P 500 ETF's return instead, while buffering the first 15% of losses. Laddered monthly, so no single start date defines your year.
Stated mandate
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
SPBU The Fund seeks to achieve its objective through a laddered portfolio of twelve AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETFs. The underlying strategy seeks to track SPY market-price returns over specified one-year periods while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses, subject to a stated spread.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSMJ vs SPBU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSMJ vs SPBU Cost
Overpaying SPBU vs PSMJ
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
SPBU 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSMJ | SPBU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,405 | $522 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $5,331 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $15,174 | $5,382 |
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- 0.79%SPBU
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
SPBU 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PSMJ vs SPBU Dividends
- PSMJ 0.00%
- SPBU
- PSMJ None
- SPBU None
Distribution history
PSMJ vs SPBU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSMJ 6.3%SPBU 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PSMJ 1.47SPBU 1.13
- Worst fall
- PSMJ −10.9%SPBU −8.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PSMJ 0.47SPBU 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.