Skip to content

BWET vs USO

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF

BWETDNYSE Arca

United States Oil Fund, LP

USOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

USO −2.64pt a year

BWET3.50%USO0.86%

Avg volume · 30D

USO 30.7×the volume

BWET187KUSO5.73M

3Y return · a year

BWET +245.0pt

BWET+276.0%USO+31.0%

BWET vs USO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5282.9%BWET+132.7%USO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BWET +5282.9%. USO +132.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.1,000%2,000%3,000%4,000%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BWET 3.50%
USO 0.86%, better
Fund size
BWET $181M
USO $1.95B
1Y total return
BWET +5282.9%, better
USO +132.7%
Holdings
BWET 12
USO 17
Avg volume (30D)
BWET 187K sh
USO 5.73M sh, better
NAV per share
BWET $953.64
USO $170.39
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BWET: Cost 4, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings 44, Durability 48. USO: Cost 65, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 100, Durability 71.
Pillar letters and Scores for BWET, USO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBWETUSO
Cost30% weightF4B65Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC43C43
Tradability15% weightB57A70Higher
Holdings10% weightC44A100Higher
Durability5% weightC48A71Higher

Rank among Energy Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BWET and USO are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Energy Futures⁠

Category · 11 funds
See all 11 ›

USO ranks 4th and BWET 10th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1AOILKProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2BDBEInvesco DB Energy FundScore 69
  3. Rank 3BDBOInvesco DB Oil FundScore 67
  4. Rank 4BUSOUnited States Oil Fund, LPScore 61
  5. Rank 5CUSLUnited States 12 Month Oil FundScore 51
  6. Rank 9DUNGUnited States Natural Gas Fund LPScore 30
  7. Rank 10DBWETBreakwave Tanker Shipping ETFScore 28
  8. Rank 11FUNLUnited States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LPScore 21

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BWETDBreakwave Tanker Shipping ETF

USOBUnited States Oil Fund, LP

In short

BWET Most energy funds bet on the barrel. BWET bets on the boat: it tracks an index of exchange-cleared futures tied to what it costs to ship crude oil by sea. A niche corner of the energy trade, wrapped in one ticker.

USO The original US crude oil ETF, trading since 2006 and still one of the busiest ways to get WTI exposure without opening a futures account. It holds oil futures near the front of the curve, not barrels in a tank.

Stated mandate

BWET The fund seeks exposure to daily changes in tanker freight futures by tracking a portfolio of exchange-cleared futures contracts tied to the cost of shipping crude oil.

USO USO seeks daily NAV percentage changes that reflect changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, measured by the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BWET Freight, not crude. It targets tanker shipping costs, a different lever than the oil-price funds that fill its peer group (OILK, DBO, BNO).
  • Rules-based exposure: it follows the Breakwave Tanker Futures Index, a defined portfolio of exchange-cleared futures rather than a trader's discretionary calls.
  • The futures machinery sits inside the fund. You buy and sell it on exchange like any listed fund, in an ordinary brokerage account.
  • USO Cheap for this corner of the market: 0.86% a year against a cohort median of 1.08%.
  • Live since 2006 and one of the most actively traded funds in its category, so bids and offers are usually there when you need them.
  • Targets daily moves in light, sweet crude delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, via its benchmark futures contract. No margin account, no expiries to roll yourself.sec.gov
  • Since April 2020 the portfolio has reached past pure front-month into later-dated contracts, a change the fund disclosed in its filings.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BWET Costs 3.50% a year, multiples of what oil-futures peers charge (OILK 0.69%, DBO 0.81%). Exposure this specialized carries a premium price tag.
  • It's a commodity pool, not a standard 1940 Act fund, so tax treatment and shareholder paperwork can look different from a plain stock ETF.
  • A small fund pointed at one narrow freight market, and it hasn't been an income payer. Price movement is the whole story here.
  • USO It's a commodity pool, so tax season brings a Schedule K-1 rather than a 1099. Peer OILK is built specifically to skip that paperwork.uscfinvestments.com
  • Futures, not barrels. Rolling contracts forward can cost when later months trade above nearer ones, which pulls results away from headline spot oil.sec.gov
  • One commodity, one price driver, and no income stream: the fund hasn't been paying distributions, so everything rides on the oil move.

Full BWET profile⁠

Full USO profile⁠

BWET vs USO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BWET vs USO Cost

Overpaying BWET vs USO

$31,687

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BWET 3.50%

    $48,055

  • USO 0.86%

    $16,368

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BWET 3.50%
  • USO 0.86%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K$50K051015202530BWET $48,055USO $16,368

Year by year

YearBWETUSOOverpaying
10$5,566$1,525$4,041
20$18,799$5,768$13,031
30$48,055$16,368$31,687

Expense ratio

  • 3.50%BWET
  • 0.86%USO, cheaper
  • Middle half of Energy Futures funds
  • Median 1.01%

USO 4th cheapest of 11 funds

BWET 11th cheapest of 11 funds

BWET vs USO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BWET None
USO None

Distribution history

BWETAll BWET payments⁠

No distribution history available.

USOAll USO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BWET vs USO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BWET 109.0%USO 43.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BWET 1.63, betterUSO 0.71
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BWET −56.9%since May 2023USO −36.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BWET 4.69USO 2.22

BWET and USO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BWETDvsOILKA

    Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF · ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF

    Expense ratio
    3.50% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USOBvsOILKA

    United States Oil Fund, LP · ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BWETDvsDBEB

    Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF · Invesco DB Energy Fund

    Expense ratio
    3.50% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USOBvsDBEB

    United States Oil Fund, LP · Invesco DB Energy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BWETDvsDBOB

    Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF · Invesco DB Oil Fund

    Expense ratio
    3.50% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USOBvsDBOB

    United States Oil Fund, LP · Invesco DB Oil Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.