DBE ranks 2nd and USO 4th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
DBE vs USO
DBE −0.07pt a year
0.79%0.86%
USO 124.9×the volume
45.9K5.73M
DBE +7.7pt
+14.9%+7.2%
DBE vs USO Performance
+158.8%+195.4%
- DBE 0.79%, better
- USO 0.86%
- DBE $152M
- USO $1.95B
- DBE +121.4%
- USO +132.7%, better
- DBE 1.65%
- USO
- DBE 8
- USO 17
- DBE 45.9K sh
- USO 5.73M sh, better
- DBE $41.15
- USO $170.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DBE | USO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | B65 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C46 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C43 | A100Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A71Higher |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. DBE and USO are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DBEB
USOB
In short
DBE Most energy ETFs buy the companies. DBE buys the barrels: a basket of energy futures tracking an Invesco commodity index, running since 2007.
USO The original US crude oil ETF, trading since 2006 and still one of the busiest ways to get WTI exposure without opening a futures account. It holds oil futures near the front of the curve, not barrels in a tank.
Stated mandate
DBE The fund seeks to follow both increases and decreases in the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index Excess Return.
USO USO seeks daily NAV percentage changes that reflect changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, measured by the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DBE vs USO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DBE vs USO Cost
Overpaying USO vs DBE
$1,194
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DBE 0.79%
$15,174
USO 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DBE | USO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,525 | $120 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,768 | $437 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $16,368 | $1,194 |
- 0.79%DBE, cheaper
- 0.86%USO
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
DBE 2nd cheapest of 11 funds
USO 4th cheapest of 11 funds
DBE vs USO Dividends
- DBE 1.65%
- USO
- DBE $0.67
- USO None
- DBE $0.67
- USO
- DBE Dec 22, 2025
- USO
- DBE Dec 26, 2025
- USO
- DBE Special
- USO
Distribution history
DBE vs USO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DBE
- USO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DBE 34.8%, betterUSO 43.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DBE 0.73, betterUSO 0.71
- Worst fall
- DBE −38.8%USO −36.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DBE 1.92USO 2.22
DBE and USO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





