Skip to content
etf.net

BWQG vs GUSE

BWM Quality Growth ETF

BWQGDCboe

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.40pt a year

BWQG0.70%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 2.2×the volume

BWQG11.3KGUSE24.9K

BWQG vs GUSE Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.7%BWQG+0.5%GUSE

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BWQG +3.7%. GUSE +0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.7.5%10%12.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BWQG 0.70%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
BWQG $32M
GUSE $421M
Holdings
BWQG 34
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
BWQG 11.3K sh
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NAV per share
BWQG $25.33
GUSE $46.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BWQG: Cost 21, Risk 69, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 56, Durability 13. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for BWQG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBWQGGUSE
Cost30% weightF21A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB69A94Higher
Tradability15% weightD33C46Higher
Holdings10% weightB56A89Higher
Durability5% weightF13A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BWQG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and BWQG 72nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 70DTFGZThornburg Focus Growth FundScore 38
  5. Rank 72DBWQGBWM Quality Growth ETFScore 37
  6. Rank 72DFRTYAlger Mid Cap 40 ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BWQGDBWM Quality Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

BWQG No data

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

BWQG No data

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

BWQG No data

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

BWQG No data

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full BWQG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

BWQG vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BWQG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying BWQG vs GUSE

$7,457

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BWQG 0.70%

    $13,606

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BWQG 0.70%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BWQG $13,606GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearBWQGGUSEOverpaying
10$1,250$545$705
20$4,760$2,113$2,647
30$13,606$6,149$7,457

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%BWQG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

BWQG 71st cheapest of 90 funds

BWQG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BWQG None
GUSE No data
Last payment
BWQG No data
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
BWQG No data
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
BWQG No data
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
BWQG No data
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

BWQGAll BWQG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

BWQG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BWQG 0.00GUSE 0.93

Popular comparisons

  • BWQGDvsJUSAA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BWQGDvsLRGCA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BWQGDvsFELGA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.