Skip to content
etf.net

BWQG vs LRGC

BWM Quality Growth ETF

BWQGDCboe

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.31pt a year

BWQG0.70%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 3.0×the volume

BWQG11.3KLRGC34.1K

BWQG vs LRGC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.7%BWQG−0.1%LRGC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BWQG +3.7%. LRGC −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.7.5%10%12.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BWQG 0.70%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
BWQG $32M
LRGC $1.37B
1Y total return
BWQG No data
LRGC +9.5%
Yield (12M)
BWQG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Holdings
BWQG 34
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
BWQG 11.3K sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
BWQG $25.33
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BWQG: Cost 21, Risk 69, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 56, Durability 13. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for BWQG, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBWQGLRGC
Cost30% weightF21A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightB69A90Higher
Tradability15% weightD33A75Higher
Holdings10% weightB56A77Higher
Durability5% weightF13A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BWQG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and BWQG 72nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 70DTFGZThornburg Focus Growth FundScore 38
  6. Rank 72DBWQGBWM Quality Growth ETFScore 37
  7. Rank 72DFRTYAlger Mid Cap 40 ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BWQGDBWM Quality Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

BWQG No data

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

BWQG No data

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

BWQG No data

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

BWQG No data

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full BWQG profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

BWQG vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BWQG vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying BWQG vs LRGC

$5,708

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BWQG 0.70%

    $13,606

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BWQG 0.70%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BWQG $13,606LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearBWQGLRGCOverpaying
10$1,250$705$545
20$4,760$2,725$2,035
30$13,606$7,898$5,708

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%BWQG
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

BWQG 71st cheapest of 90 funds

BWQG vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BWQG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Payout (12M)
BWQG None
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
BWQG No data
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
BWQG No data
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
BWQG No data
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
BWQG No data
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BWQGAll BWQG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

BWQG vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BWQG No dataLRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BWQG No dataLRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BWQG No dataLRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BWQG 0.00LRGC 1.00

BWQG and LRGC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • BWQGDvsJUSAA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BWQGDvsGUSEA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BWQGDvsFELGA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.