Skip to content

BWQG vs JUSA

BWM Quality Growth ETF

BWQGDCboe

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.52pt a year

BWQG0.70%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 8.7×the volume

BWQG11.3KJUSA98.8K

BWQG vs JUSA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.7%BWQG+0.5%JUSA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BWQG +3.7%. JUSA +0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.7.5%10%12.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BWQG 0.70%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
BWQG $32M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
BWQG No data
JUSA +10.8%
Yield (12M)
BWQG No data
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
BWQG 34
JUSA 263
Avg volume (30D)
BWQG 11.3K sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
BWQG $25.33
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BWQG: Cost 21, Risk 69, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 56, Durability 13. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for BWQG, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBWQGJUSA
Cost30% weightF21A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightB69A92Higher
Tradability15% weightD33B58Higher
Holdings10% weightB56A84Higher
Durability5% weightF13A76Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BWQG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and BWQG 72nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 70DTFGZThornburg Focus Growth FundScore 38
  4. Rank 72DBWQGBWM Quality Growth ETFScore 37
  5. Rank 72DFRTYAlger Mid Cap 40 ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BWQGDBWM Quality Growth ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

BWQG No data

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

BWQG No data

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

BWQG No data

  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

BWQG No data

  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full BWQG profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

BWQG vs JUSA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BWQG vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying BWQG vs JUSA

$9,857

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BWQG 0.70%

    $13,606

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BWQG 0.70%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BWQG $13,606JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearBWQGJUSAOverpaying
10$1,250$328$922
20$4,760$1,281$3,479
30$13,606$3,749$9,857

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%BWQG
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

BWQG 71st cheapest of 90 funds

BWQG vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BWQG No data
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
BWQG None
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
BWQG No data
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
BWQG No data
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
BWQG No data
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
BWQG No data
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

BWQGAll BWQG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

BWQG vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BWQG No dataJUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BWQG No dataJUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BWQG No dataJUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BWQG 0.00JUSA 0.98

BWQG and JUSA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BWQGDvsGUSEA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BWQGDvsLRGCA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BWQGDvsFELGA

    BWM Quality Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.