GUSE ranks 2nd and CARK 48th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
CARK vs GUSE
GUSE −0.24pt a year
0.54%0.30%
GUSE 7.4×the volume
3.38K24.9K
CARK vs GUSE Performance
+2.4%+11.3%
- CARK 0.54%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- CARK $325M
- GUSE $413M
- CARK −0.5%
- GUSE
- CARK 0.01%
- GUSE
- CARK 27
- GUSE 122
- CARK 3.38K sh
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- CARK $45.70
- GUSE $45.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CARK | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. CARK and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CARKC
GUSEA
In short
CARK A Chicago boutique's large-growth playbook in ETF form: a concentrated book of big U.S. franchises picked for profitability and free cash flow rather than headline revenue growth.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
CARK The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in large-capitalization common stocks through a bottom-up fundamental process focused on established growth companies with sustainable competitive advantages and strong potential free-cash-flow margins and earnings growth.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CARK vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CARK vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying CARK vs GUSE
$4,571
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CARK 0.54%
$10,720
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CARK | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $971 | $545 | $426 |
| 20 | $3,724 | $2,113 | $1,611 |
| 30 | $10,720 | $6,149 | $4,571 |
- 0.54%CARK
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
CARK 42nd cheapest of 90 funds
CARK vs GUSE Dividends
- CARK 0.01%
- GUSE
- CARK $0.0066
- GUSE
- CARK $0.0066
- GUSE $0.30
- CARK Dec 30, 2025
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- CARK Jan 7, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- CARK Irregular
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
CARK vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CARK 17.0%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- CARK 0.60GUSE
- Worst fall
- CARK −25.2%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- CARK 1.29GUSE 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.54% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.