Skip to content

CARK vs LRGC

CastleArk Large Growth ETF

CARKCNYSE Arca

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

34.8%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.15pt a year

CARK0.54%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 10.1×the volume

CARK3.38KLRGC34.1K

CARK vs LRGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−0.5%CARK+9.2%LRGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CARK −0.5%. LRGC +9.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CARK 0.54%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
CARK $325M
LRGC $1.35B
1Y total return
CARK −0.5%
LRGC +9.2%, better
Yield (12M)
CARK 0.01%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Holdings
CARK 27
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
CARK 3.38K sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
CARK $45.70
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CARK: Cost 54, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 44, Holdings 36, Durability 60. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for CARK, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCARKLRGC
Cost30% weightC54A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightC43A90Higher
Tradability15% weightC44A75Higher
Holdings10% weightD36A77Higher
Durability5% weightB60A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CARK and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and CARK 48th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 48CAFGRFirst Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETFScore 47
  6. Rank 48CCARKCastleArk Large Growth ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 50CATFVAlger 35 ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CARKCCastleArk Large Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

CARK A Chicago boutique's large-growth playbook in ETF form: a concentrated book of big U.S. franchises picked for profitability and free cash flow rather than headline revenue growth.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

CARK The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in large-capitalization common stocks through a bottom-up fundamental process focused on established growth companies with sustainable competitive advantages and strong potential free-cash-flow margins and earnings growth.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • CARK Concentrated by design. A focused portfolio of predominantly U.S. companies above $4 billion in market cap at purchase means manager conviction, not index weights, sets the shape of the fund.castleark-etfs.com
  • The screen is franchise quality: businesses the team sees as harder to disrupt, with high profitability and free cash flow, which it ranks above the raw rate of revenue growth.castleark-etfs.com
  • Fee sits right at the middle of its active large-growth peer group at 0.54%, so the concentration and stock picking do not come with a premium sticker.
  • Not a startup strategy in a new wrapper: the ETF, launched in 2023, carries the name of a manager its co-founder started building in 1999.castleark-etfs.com
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • CARK Concentration cuts both ways. With a small number of positions, one company's stumble moves this fund far more than it would a broad growth index.castleark-etfs.com
  • It trades thinly. Spreads can be wider than on mega-cap growth funds, and order type and timing matter more than they do in heavily traded names.
  • Cheaper competition is real: JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) chase large-cap growth for a fraction of the fee, and our review places CARK in the lower half of this peer group.
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full CARK profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

CARK vs LRGC Holdings

How CARK and LRGC differ

Overlap by weight

34.8%

Shared holdings make up 54.5% of CARK and 37.3% of LRGC.

Level by level

  • Holdings11 in both34.8%
  • Sector11 Sectors79.7%
  • Countryby domicile96.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CARK and LRGC, widest gap first
SectorMore in CARKMore in LRGC
TechnologyCARK +19.2 points
IndustrialsLRGC +5.1 points
EnergyLRGC +3.1 points
Consumer StaplesLRGC +2.6 points
FinancialsLRGC +2.4 points
UtilitiesLRGC +1.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryLRGC +1.6 points
Health CareLRGC +1.4 points
Real EstateLRGC +1.3 points
MaterialsLRGC +1.1 points
CommunicationCARK +1.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CARK and LRGC, widest gap first
CountryMore in CARKMore in LRGC
United StatesCARK +3.2 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.2 points
NetherlandsLRGC +1.2 points
United KingdomLRGC +0.8 points
CanadaCARK +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CARK61.8%
  • LRGC42.4%

Securities held

  • CARK26
  • LRGC71

Asset class

CARK
Equity
LRGC
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CARK15
  • In both11
  • Only in LRGC60

Only in CARK

15 securities, 41.8% of CARK by weight

  • Alphabet Inc-Cl A5.74%
  • Arista Networks Inc4.54%
  • Lam Research Corp4.31%

Only in LRGC

60 securities, 62.5% of LRGC by weight

  • Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.0015.11%
  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock1.86%
  • Eog Resources Inc Common Stock USD.011.73%

Weight gaps

All 11 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CARK and LRGC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CARKMore in LRGC
NVIDIA CorpNVDACARK +6.06 points
Eli Lilly & CoLLYCARK +5.29 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNLRGC +2.17 points
Visa Inc-Class A SharesVCARK +2.12 points
Ge Vernova IncGEVCARK +1.82 points
Broadcom IncAVGOCARK +1.60 points
Apple IncAAPLCARK +0.97 points
Servicenow IncNOWCARK +0.79 points

All CARK holdings⁠All 70 LRGC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CARK vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying CARK vs LRGC

$2,822

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CARK 0.54%

    $10,720

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CARK 0.54%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530CARK $10,720LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearCARKLRGCOverpaying
10$971$705$266
20$3,724$2,725$999
30$10,720$7,898$2,822

Expense ratio

  • 0.54%CARK
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

CARK 42nd cheapest of 90 funds

CARK vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CARK 0.01%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Payout (12M)
CARK $0.0066
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
CARK $0.0066
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
CARK Dec 30, 2025
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
CARK Jan 7, 2026
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
CARK Irregular
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CARKIrregular · 2 paymentsAll CARK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.0091; Dec 30, 2025 $0.0066. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

CARK vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CARK 17.0%since Jan 2024LRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CARK 0.60since Jan 2024LRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CARK −25.2%since Dec 2023LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CARK 1.29LRGC 1.00

CARK and LRGC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CARKCvsJUSAA

    CastleArk Large Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CARKCvsGUSEA

    CastleArk Large Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CARKCvsFELGA

    CastleArk Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.