PAPR ranks 11th and CAUG 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
CAUG vs PAPR
0.0%by weight
CAUG −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
PAPR 80.1×the volume
41032.8K
CAUG vs PAPR Performance
−1.1%−0.3%
- CAUG 0.30%, better
- PAPR 0.79%
- CAUG $1M
- PAPR $959M
- CAUG
- PAPR +11.9%
- CAUG
- PAPR 0.00%
- CAUG 4
- PAPR 3
- CAUG 410 sh
- PAPR 32.8K sh, better
- CAUG $25.21
- PAPR $43.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAUG | PAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | F14 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F2 | A83Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. CAUG and PAPR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAUGC
PAPRC
In short
PAPR Innovator's April door. PAPR takes the first 15% of losses on the S&P 500 fund it references and caps your upside in exchange. The buffer resets every April 1, so the deal is rewritten once a year. Running since 2019.
Stated mandate
PAPR The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy tied to SPY over the April 1, 2026–March 31, 2027 Outcome Period, seeking to limit upside at a cap while protecting the first 15% of underlying losses before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAUG vs PAPR Holdings
How CAUG and PAPR differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CAUG and 0.0% of PAPR.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in CAUGMore in PAPR | CAUG | PAPR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CAUGMore in PAPR | CAUG | PAPR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CAUG102.9%
- PAPR107.5%
- CAUG3
- PAPR3
Asset class
- CAUG
- Equity
- PAPR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CAUG3
- In both0
- Only in PAPR3
Only in CAUG
3 securities, 100% of CAUG by weight
- Spy 07/30/2027 151.53 C79.91%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202716.78%
- Spy 07/30/2027 757.67 P4.99%
Only in PAPR
3 securities, 100% of PAPR by weight
- Spy 03/31/2027 6.5 C105.89%
- Spy 03/31/2027 650.34 P1.29%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.28%
Weight gaps
CAUG and PAPR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAUG vs PAPR Cost
Overpaying PAPR vs CAUG
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAUG 0.30%
$6,149
PAPR 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAUG | PAPR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CAUG, cheaper
- 0.79%PAPR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
CAUG cheapest of 51 funds
PAPR 24th cheapest of 51 funds
CAUG vs PAPR Dividends
- CAUG
- PAPR 0.00%
- CAUG None
- PAPR None
Distribution history
CAUG vs PAPR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAUG PAPR 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAUG PAPR 1.31
- Worst fall
- CAUG PAPR −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CAUG 0.00PAPR 0.45
CAUG and PAPR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
