Skip to content

CCOM vs USG

Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

CCOMFNYSE Arca

USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

USGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

USG −0.54pt a year

CCOM0.99%USG0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

USG 26.8×the volume

CCOM158USG4.23K

CCOM vs USG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.9%CCOM−6.9%USG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CCOM +11.9%. USG −6.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CCOM 0.99%
USG 0.45%, better
Fund size
CCOM $111M
USG $9M
1Y total return
CCOM No data
USG −6.4%
Yield (12M)
CCOM No data
USG 32.00%
Holdings
CCOM 21
USG 3
Avg volume (30D)
CCOM 158 sh
USG 4.23K sh, better
NAV per share
CCOM $26.26
USG $29.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CCOM: Cost 8, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 4, Holdings not scored, Durability 52. USG: Cost 99, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings not scored, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for CCOM, USG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCCOMUSG
Cost30% weightF8A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60HigherD32
Tradability15% weightF4D27Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC52HigherD39

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CCOM and USG are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

USG ranks 5th and CCOM 12th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  2. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62
  3. Rank 6BDBBInvesco DB Base Metals FundScore 61
  4. Rank 11DKCCAKraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETFScore 29
  5. Rank 12FCCOMSimplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 22
  6. Rank 13FBDRYBreakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETFScore 17

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CCOMFSimplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

USGBUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

In short

CCOM Chinese commodity futures are a market most US investors never see. CCOM trades them systematically, long and short, inside a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099 instead of a K-1.

USG Gold with a paycheck attached. USG holds claims on real gold bars plus collateralized futures, sells call options against that gold, and distributes quarterly, at one of the lowest fees in the commodity-futures crowd.

Stated mandate

CCOM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures traded on major Chinese exchanges. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models.

USG The Fund seeks long-term results that generally correspond to gold-price performance while generating dividend income from selling gold call options and collateral interest. It obtains gold exposure through gold warrants, collateralized futures, and related derivatives.

Why people hold it

  • CCOM Targets commodity futures on China's major exchanges, a pool of contracts priced by local supply and demand rather than the usual US benchmarks.
  • The models go long and short, so the fund can position for falling contracts as well as rising ones instead of riding one direction.
  • No Schedule K-1. It is built as a 1940 Act fund, so tax time brings a 1099 like any ordinary ETF.
  • Simplify already runs the broad-basket version (HARD); CCOM is the China-only slice for investors who want that exposure separated out.
  • USG At 0.45% a year it charges well under the 0.79% cohort median, and less than top-ranked commodity peers PDBC, SOYB and WEAT.
  • Gold that throws off cash: the fund writes call options against its gold exposure and earns collateral interest, then pays shareholders quarterly.uscfinvestments.com
  • Exposure comes via COMEX gold warrants (ownership claims on bars in licensed depositories) and fully collateralized futures, actively run through a Cayman subsidiary capped at 25% of assets.alpsinc.com
  • USCF states the fund delivers its gold-plus-income strategy without a K-1, sparing the tax-form headache common to commodity products.uscfinvestments.comalpsinc.com

Worth knowing

  • CCOM The fee is 0.99% a year, above the typical charge among commodity futures funds. That is the toll for a strategy reaching markets few US managers access.
  • Launched in 2026 and lightly traded, so there is not much history to judge and spreads can run wider than in the big commodity ETFs.
  • Not a plain commodity tracker. The short book means results can move apart from a straight long basket of commodities, in either direction.
  • USG Covered calls swap upside for income. Above the strike plus premium collected, further gold gains go to the option buyer, while the fund keeps the downside if gold slides.alpsinc.com
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the household-name gold ETFs.
  • Payouts can include return of capital, meaning part of a distribution may be capital coming back rather than income the fund earned.

Full CCOM profile⁠

Full USG profile⁠

CCOM vs USG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CCOM vs USG Cost

Overpaying CCOM vs USG

$9,484

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CCOM 0.99%

    $18,525

  • USG 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CCOM 0.99%
  • USG 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530CCOM $18,525USG $9,041

Year by year

YearCCOMUSGOverpaying
10$1,746$812$934
20$6,565$3,128$3,437
30$18,525$9,041$9,484

Expense ratio

  • 0.99%CCOM
  • 0.45%USG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

USG cheapest of 13 funds

CCOM 12th cheapest of 13 funds

CCOM vs USG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CCOM No data
USG 32.00%
Payout (12M)
CCOM No data
USG $9.52
Last payment
CCOM $0.10
USG $0.17
Ex-dividend
CCOM Sep 25, 2026
USG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
CCOM Sep 30, 2026
USG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
CCOM Quarterly
USG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CCOMQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CCOM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD
USGQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll USG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2022 $0.17; Sep 27, 2022 $0.44; Dec 27, 2022 $0.12; Mar 21, 2023 $0.18; Jun 20, 2023 $0.26; Sep 19, 2023 $0.84; Dec 19, 2023 $0.80; Mar 19, 2024 $0.17; Jun 20, 2024 $0.09; Sep 20, 2024 $1.59; Dec 23, 2024 $0.33; Mar 19, 2025 $0.16; Jun 20, 2025 $0.21; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $8.92; Mar 20, 2026 $0.19; Jun 18, 2026 $0.25; Sep 21, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD

CCOM vs USG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CCOM No dataUSG 17.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CCOM No dataUSG 0.87
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CCOM No dataUSG −28.8%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CCOM −0.02USG 0.28

Popular comparisons

  • CCOMFvsPDBCA

    Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USGBvsPDBCA

    USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCOMFvsSOYBB

    Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USGBvsSOYBB

    USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCOMFvsWEATB

    Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USGBvsWEATB

    USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.