Skip to content
etf.net

CGGG vs GUSE

Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

CGGGBNYSE Arca

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.09pt a year

CGGG0.39%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

CGGG 2.1×the volume

CGGG52.3KGUSE24.9K

CGGG vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−5.9%CGGG+11.3%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CGGG −5.9%. GUSE +11.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CGGG 0.39%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
CGGG $71M
GUSE $413M
1Y total return
CGGG −8.0%
GUSE No data
Holdings
CGGG 43
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
CGGG 52.3K sh, better
GUSE 24.9K sh
NAV per share
CGGG $27.02
GUSE $45.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGGG: Cost 82, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 55, Durability 43. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGGG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGGGGUSE
Cost30% weightA82A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD39A94Higher
Tradability15% weightB60HigherC46
Holdings10% weightB55A89Higher
Durability5% weightC43A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGGG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and CGGG 20th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 18BLGROLevel Four Large Cap Growth Active ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 20BCGGGCapital Group U.S. Large Growth ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 21BBKCGBNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGGGBCapital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

CGGG Capital Group's take on the growth ETF: a focused, research-driven portfolio of large U.S. companies with big markets and durable moats, at a fee that undercuts the typical active growth fund. Launched in 2025, so the live record is short.

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

CGGG The fund seeks capital appreciation through a focused, research-intensive growth strategy investing in high-growth U.S. companies with large markets and durable competitive advantages.

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

  • CGGG Costs 0.39% a year against a 0.54% median for its active U.S. growth peers. That is index-adjacent pricing for a stock-picking mandate.
  • The mandate is specific, not vague: high-growth U.S. companies with large markets and durable competitive advantages, chosen through research rather than index weights.
  • In a crowded field of dozens of active U.S. growth ETFs, this one already sits among the stronger implementations on cost and structure.
  • Trades with moderate volume, enough that ordinary orders are not fighting for a counterparty, which is not a given for a fund this new.
  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • CGGG Focus cuts both ways. A concentrated growth portfolio means individual names and the growth style itself move results more than in a whole-market fund.
  • It launched in 2025, so there is no full market cycle to judge, and risk statistics rest on a short history.
  • Cheaper routes to a growth tilt exist: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18% run index-plus strategies for a fraction of the fee.
  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full CGGG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

CGGG vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGGG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying CGGG vs GUSE

$1,749

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGGG 0.39%

    $7,898

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGGG 0.39%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CGGG $7,898GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearCGGGGUSEOverpaying
10$705$545$160
20$2,725$2,113$612
30$7,898$6,149$1,749

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%CGGG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

CGGG 14th cheapest of 90 funds

CGGG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Last payment
CGGG $0.005
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
CGGG Jun 30, 2026
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
CGGG Jul 1, 2026
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
CGGG Twice a year
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CGGGTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll CGGG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 30, 2026 $0.005. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

CGGG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGGG 17.0%since Jul 2025GUSE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGGG −0.02since Jul 2025GUSE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGGG −17.7%since Jun 2025GUSE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGGG 1.29GUSE 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • CGGGBvsJUSAA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CGGGBvsLRGCA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CGGGBvsFELGA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.