Skip to content

CGGG vs JUSA

Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

CGGGBNYSE Arca

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

35.3%by weight

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.21pt a year

CGGG0.39%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 1.9×the volume

CGGG52.3KJUSA98.8K

CGGG vs JUSA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−8.0%CGGG+10.3%JUSA

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CGGG −8.0%. JUSA +10.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%0%5%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CGGG 0.39%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
CGGG $71M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
CGGG −8.0%
JUSA +10.3%, better
Yield (12M)
CGGG No data
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
CGGG 43
JUSA 265
Avg volume (30D)
CGGG 52.3K sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
CGGG $27.02
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGGG: Cost 82, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 55, Durability 43. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 59, Holdings 83, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGGG, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGGGJUSA
Cost30% weightA82A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightD39A92Higher
Tradability15% weightB60HigherB59
Holdings10% weightB55A83Higher
Durability5% weightC43A76Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGGG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and CGGG 20th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 18BLGROLevel Four Large Cap Growth Active ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 20BCGGGCapital Group U.S. Large Growth ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 21BBKCGBNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGGGBCapital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

CGGG Capital Group's take on the growth ETF: a focused, research-driven portfolio of large U.S. companies with big markets and durable moats, at a fee that undercuts the typical active growth fund. Launched in 2025, so the live record is short.

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

CGGG The fund seeks capital appreciation through a focused, research-intensive growth strategy investing in high-growth U.S. companies with large markets and durable competitive advantages.

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

  • CGGG Costs 0.39% a year against a 0.54% median for its active U.S. growth peers. That is index-adjacent pricing for a stock-picking mandate.
  • The mandate is specific, not vague: high-growth U.S. companies with large markets and durable competitive advantages, chosen through research rather than index weights.
  • In a crowded field of dozens of active U.S. growth ETFs, this one already sits among the stronger implementations on cost and structure.
  • Trades with moderate volume, enough that ordinary orders are not fighting for a counterparty, which is not a given for a fund this new.
  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

  • CGGG Focus cuts both ways. A concentrated growth portfolio means individual names and the growth style itself move results more than in a whole-market fund.
  • It launched in 2025, so there is no full market cycle to judge, and risk statistics rest on a short history.
  • Cheaper routes to a growth tilt exist: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18% run index-plus strategies for a fraction of the fee.
  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full CGGG profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

CGGG vs JUSA Holdings

How CGGG and JUSA differ

Overlap by weight

35.3%

Shared holdings make up 85.0% of CGGG and 43.1% of JUSA.

Level by level

  • Holdings31 in both35.3%
  • Countryby domicile98.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for CGGG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CGGG and JUSA, widest gap first
CountryMore in CGGGMore in JUSA
BrazilCGGG +1.5 points
United StatesJUSA +1.4 points
Other countries (2)JUSA +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CGGG57.7%
  • JUSA37.4%

Securities held

  • CGGG41
  • JUSA263

Asset class

CGGG
Equity
JUSA
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CGGG10
  • In both31
  • Only in JUSA232

Only in CGGG

10 securities, 13.8% of CGGG by weight

  • Strategy Inc Common Stock USD.0013.09%
  • Ftai Aviation Ltd Common Stock USD1.01.75%
  • Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd Common Stock USD.011.75%

Only in JUSA

232 securities, 56.8% of JUSA by weight

  • Alphabet Inc-Cl A -2.53%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.39%
  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.37%

Weight gaps

All 31 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CGGG and JUSA, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CGGGMore in JUSA
Broadcom Inc Common StockAVGOCGGG +5.38 points
Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.001GOOGCGGG +5.12 points
Apple Inc Common Stock USD.00001AAPLJUSA +4.85 points
Meta Platforms Inc Class A Common Stock USD.000006METACGGG +4.02 points
Amphenol Corp Class A Common Stock USD.001APHCGGG +3.75 points
Micron Technology Inc Common Stock USD.1MUCGGG +3.22 points
Mastercard Inc A Common Stock USD.0001MACGGG +3.06 points
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc Common Stock USD.01VRTXCGGG +2.78 points

All CGGG holdings⁠All 261 JUSA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGGG vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying CGGG vs JUSA

$4,149

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGGG 0.39%

    $7,898

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGGG 0.39%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CGGG $7,898JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearCGGGJUSAOverpaying
10$705$328$377
20$2,725$1,281$1,444
30$7,898$3,749$4,149

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%CGGG
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

CGGG 14th cheapest of 90 funds

CGGG vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGGG No data
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
CGGG No data
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
CGGG $0.005
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
CGGG Jun 30, 2026
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
CGGG Jul 1, 2026
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
CGGG Twice a year
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CGGGTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll CGGG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 30, 2026 $0.005. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

CGGG vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGGG 17.0%since Jul 2025JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGGG −0.02since Jul 2025JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGGG −17.7%since Jun 2025JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGGG 1.29JUSA 0.98

CGGG and JUSA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CGGGBvsGUSEA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGGGBvsLRGCA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGGGBvsFELGA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.