Skip to content

CGGG vs LRGC

Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

CGGGBNYSE Arca

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

CGGG0.39%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

CGGG 1.5×the volume

CGGG52.3KLRGC34.1K

CGGG vs LRGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−8.0%CGGG+9.2%LRGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CGGG −8.0%. LRGC +9.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−5%0%5%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CGGG 0.39%
LRGC 0.39%
Fund size
CGGG $71M
LRGC $1.35B
1Y total return
CGGG −8.0%
LRGC +9.2%, better
Yield (12M)
CGGG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Holdings
CGGG 43
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
CGGG 52.3K sh, better
LRGC 34.1K sh
NAV per share
CGGG $27.02
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGGG: Cost 82, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 55, Durability 43. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGGG, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGGGLRGC
Cost30% weightA82A82
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightD39A90Higher
Tradability15% weightB60A75Higher
Holdings10% weightB55A77Higher
Durability5% weightC43A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGGG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and CGGG 20th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 18BLGROLevel Four Large Cap Growth Active ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 20BCGGGCapital Group U.S. Large Growth ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 21BBKCGBNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGGGBCapital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

CGGG Capital Group's take on the growth ETF: a focused, research-driven portfolio of large U.S. companies with big markets and durable moats, at a fee that undercuts the typical active growth fund. Launched in 2025, so the live record is short.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

CGGG The fund seeks capital appreciation through a focused, research-intensive growth strategy investing in high-growth U.S. companies with large markets and durable competitive advantages.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • CGGG Costs 0.39% a year against a 0.54% median for its active U.S. growth peers. That is index-adjacent pricing for a stock-picking mandate.
  • The mandate is specific, not vague: high-growth U.S. companies with large markets and durable competitive advantages, chosen through research rather than index weights.
  • In a crowded field of dozens of active U.S. growth ETFs, this one already sits among the stronger implementations on cost and structure.
  • Trades with moderate volume, enough that ordinary orders are not fighting for a counterparty, which is not a given for a fund this new.
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • CGGG Focus cuts both ways. A concentrated growth portfolio means individual names and the growth style itself move results more than in a whole-market fund.
  • It launched in 2025, so there is no full market cycle to judge, and risk statistics rest on a short history.
  • Cheaper routes to a growth tilt exist: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18% run index-plus strategies for a fraction of the fee.
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full CGGG profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

CGGG vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGGG vs LRGC Cost

Same expense ratio

$7,898

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGGG 0.39%

    $7,898

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGGG 0.39%
  • LRGC 0.39%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CGGG $7,898LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearCGGGLRGC
10$705$705
20$2,725$2,725
30$7,898$7,898

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%CGGG
  • 0.39%LRGC
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

CGGG 14th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

CGGG vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGGG No data
LRGC 0.53%
Payout (12M)
CGGG No data
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
CGGG $0.005
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
CGGG Jun 30, 2026
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
CGGG Jul 1, 2026
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
CGGG Twice a year
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CGGGTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll CGGG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 30, 2026 $0.005. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

CGGG vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGGG 17.0%since Jul 2025LRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGGG −0.02since Jul 2025LRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGGG −17.7%since Jun 2025LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGGG 1.29LRGC 1.00

CGGG and LRGC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CGGGBvsJUSAA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGGGBvsGUSEA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGGGBvsFELGA

    Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.