Skip to content

CMDT vs HARD

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CMDTBNYSE Arca

Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

HARDCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CMDT −0.20pt a year

CMDT0.65%HARD0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

CMDT 2.1×the volume

CMDT65.9KHARD31.3K

3Y return · a year

HARD +4.0pt

CMDT+14.2%HARD+18.2%

CMDT vs HARD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+28.0%CMDT+25.0%HARD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CMDT +28.0%. HARD +25.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CMDT 0.65%, better
HARD 0.85%
Fund size
CMDT $890M
HARD $59M
1Y total return
CMDT +28.0%, better
HARD +25.0%
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.09%, better
HARD 3.36%
Holdings
CMDT 357
HARD 20
Avg volume (30D)
CMDT 65.9K sh, better
HARD 31.3K sh
NAV per share
CMDT $31.84
HARD $35.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CMDT: Cost 61, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 70, Durability 72. HARD: Cost 38, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings not scored, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for CMDT, HARD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCMDTHARD
Cost30% weightB61HigherD38
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA81HigherC49
Tradability15% weightC51HigherD39
Holdings10% weightA70Not scored
Durability5% weightA72HigherC54

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CMDT and HARD are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

CMDT ranks 4th and HARD 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  5. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62
  6. Rank 7CACOMHarbor Active Commodity ETFScore 42
  7. Rank 7CHARDSimplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 42
  8. Rank 9CEVMTInvesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CMDTBPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

HARDCSimplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

In short

CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.

HARD Most broad commodity funds buy the basket and hold on. HARD runs a systematic long/short model built by Altis Partners across the futures complex, and mails a 1099 instead of a K-1.

Stated mandate

CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.

HARD HARD seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models designed by Altis Partners to pursue commodity exposure across inflationary and typical market environments.

Why people hold it

  • CMDT Active by design. The stated objective is to outperform the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, not replicate it.
  • Two engines in one ticker: swaps, futures and commodity-linked notes for the commodity exposure, an actively managed fixed income portfolio as the collateral behind them.
  • A 1940 Act fund that routes commodity-linked exposure through a Cayman subsidiary, so holders get a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.
  • Global commodity reach spread across roughly 300 positions, with cash distributed quarterly.
  • HARD Long/short by design: the models can take short positions as well as long ones across commodities, not just ride a long-only basket.
  • Built as a 1940 Act fund, so holders get standard 1099 paperwork rather than the partnership K-1 some commodity futures funds send.
  • A 0.78% expense ratio sits under the median fee in its commodity futures cohort, which is rare for an actively managed futures strategy.
  • Lands in the upper half of its commodity futures peer group, in company with broad names like PDBC and DBB.

Worth knowing

  • CMDT At 0.98% a year, it sits above cheaper index-based options in the commodity futures group such as PDBC (0.74%) and HARD (0.78%). Active management is what the premium buys.
  • Tracking is not the goal here. Manager calls can push results away from the Bloomberg Commodity Index in either direction.
  • The bond collateral sleeve brings interest rate and credit sensitivity that a plain futures-and-Treasuries commodity fund does not carry.
  • HARD Model-driven and launched in 2023: no index to check it against, and a short live record so far.
  • Commodity futures move in big steps, and a long/short book can end up offside on either side of a trade.
  • Moderately traded and smaller than the category's giants, so spreads can run wider than the largest commodity ETFs.

Full CMDT profile⁠

Full HARD profile⁠

CMDT vs HARD Holdings

How CMDT and HARD differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CMDT and 0.0% of HARD.

Level by level

  • Asset classCommodities, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile89.3%

Sector

No Sector split for HARD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CMDT and HARD, widest gap first
CountryMore in CMDTMore in HARD
United StatesHARD +10.7 points
CanadaCMDT +10.7 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CMDT28.3%
  • HARD82.9%

Securities held

  • CMDT323
  • HARD15

Asset class

CMDT
Commodities
HARD
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in CMDT323
  • In both0
  • Only in HARD15

Only in CMDT

323 securities, 88.6% of CMDT by weight

  • Pimco Enhanced Short Maturity Pimco Enhanced Short Maturit5.22%
  • Vistra Operations Co Llc Company Guar 144A 01/27 3.7 3.70% 01/30/20271.57%
  • Cpde Invt Co Llc 4.36% 01/08/20271.47%

Only in HARD

15 securities, 80.5% of HARD by weight

  • Simplify E Govt Money Mkt Etf26.73%
  • Brent Crude Futr JAN2717.35%
  • Brent Crude Futr FEB276.54%

Weight gaps

CMDT and HARD share no securities.

All 303 CMDT holdings⁠All 75 HARD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CMDT vs HARD Cost

Overpaying HARD vs CMDT

$3,482

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CMDT 0.65%

    $12,717

  • HARD 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CMDT 0.65%
  • HARD 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HARD $16,199CMDT $12,717

Year by year

YearCMDTHARDOverpaying
10$1,163$1,508$345
20$4,440$5,706$1,266
30$12,717$16,199$3,482

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
  • 0.85%HARD
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds

HARD 9th cheapest of 13 funds

CMDT vs HARD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.09%, better
HARD 3.36%
Payout (12M)
CMDT $3.83
HARD $1.20
Last payment
CMDT $3.20
HARD $0.30
Ex-dividend
CMDT Oct 1, 2026
HARD Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
CMDT Oct 5, 2026
HARD Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
CMDT Quarterly
HARD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CMDTQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll CMDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jul 3, 2023 $0.03; Oct 2, 2023 $0.32; Dec 11, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.31; Apr 1, 2024 $0.27; Jul 1, 2024 $0.26; Oct 1, 2024 $0.76; Dec 31, 2024 $0.93; Apr 1, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.21; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Dec 31, 2025 $0.22; Apr 1, 2026 $0.19; Jul 1, 2026 $0.22; Oct 1, 2026 $3.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
HARDQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll HARD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2023 $0.10; Sep 27, 2023 $0.10; Dec 26, 2023 $0.26; Mar 25, 2024 $0.15; Jun 25, 2024 $0.15; Sep 25, 2024 $0.30; Dec 23, 2024 $0.35; Mar 26, 2025 $0.12; Jun 25, 2025 $0.25; Sep 25, 2025 $0.30; Dec 23, 2025 $0.30; Mar 26, 2026 $0.30; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

CMDT vs HARD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CMDT 11.5%, betterHARD 17.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CMDT 0.83, betterHARD 0.80
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CMDT −13.2%since May 2023HARD −21.0%since Mar 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CMDT 0.78HARD 0.82

CMDT and HARD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CMDTBvsPDBCA

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HARDCvsPDBCA

    Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsSOYBB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HARDCvsSOYBB

    Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsWEATB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HARDCvsWEATB

    Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.