Skip to content

HARD vs SOYB

Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

HARDCNYSE Arca

Teucrium Soybean Fund

SOYBBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SOYB −0.22pt a year

HARD0.85%SOYB0.63%

Avg volume · 30D

SOYB 2.2×the volume

HARD31.3KSOYB68.9K

3Y return · a year

HARD +19.8pt

HARD+18.2%SOYB−1.6%

HARD vs SOYB Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+25.0%HARD+13.0%SOYB

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HARD +25.0%. SOYB +13.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HARD 0.85%
SOYB 0.63%, better
Fund size
HARD $59M
SOYB $39M
1Y total return
HARD +25.0%, better
SOYB +13.0%
Yield (12M)
HARD 3.36%
SOYB No data
Holdings
HARD 20
SOYB 12
Avg volume (30D)
HARD 31.3K sh
SOYB 68.9K sh, better
NAV per share
HARD $35.92
SOYB $26.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HARD: Cost 38, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings not scored, Durability 54. SOYB: Cost 69, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for HARD, SOYB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHARDSOYB
Cost30% weightD38B69Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49B56Higher
Tradability15% weightD39A76Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC54HigherC49

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HARD and SOYB are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

SOYB ranks 2nd and HARD 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 7CACOMHarbor Active Commodity ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 7CHARDSimplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 9CEVMTInvesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HARDCSimplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

SOYBBTeucrium Soybean Fund

In short

HARD Most broad commodity funds buy the basket and hold on. HARD runs a systematic long/short model built by Altis Partners across the futures complex, and mails a 1099 instead of a K-1.

SOYB Soybeans, straight up. Since 2011 SOYB has tracked a benchmark of soybean futures for future delivery, wrapped so you can buy the bean in an ordinary brokerage account, and it charges less than the typical commodity futures fund.

Stated mandate

HARD HARD seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models designed by Altis Partners to pursue commodity exposure across inflationary and typical market environments.

SOYB SOYB seeks to track daily changes in the soybean market for future delivery through its benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • HARD Long/short by design: the models can take short positions as well as long ones across commodities, not just ride a long-only basket.
  • Built as a 1940 Act fund, so holders get standard 1099 paperwork rather than the partnership K-1 some commodity futures funds send.
  • A 0.78% expense ratio sits under the median fee in its commodity futures cohort, which is rare for an actively managed futures strategy.
  • Lands in the upper half of its commodity futures peer group, in company with broad names like PDBC and DBB.
  • SOYB Fee of 0.63% a year sits under the 0.81% median for commodity futures funds, and under diversified rival PDBC at 0.74%.
  • A single-crop play, not a commodity grab bag: the fund follows the Teucrium Soybean Index, which tracks daily moves in soybean futures.
  • Trading since 2011, a long run for a one-commodity fund, and one of the stronger implementations in its commodity futures peer group.

Worth knowing

  • HARD Model-driven and launched in 2023: no index to check it against, and a short live record so far.
  • Commodity futures move in big steps, and a long/short book can end up offside on either side of a trade.
  • Moderately traded and smaller than the category's giants, so spreads can run wider than the largest commodity ETFs.
  • SOYB One crop, one price. Weather, harvest cycles and export demand move soybean futures hard, and there is nothing else in the portfolio to soften it.
  • It is a commodity pool, not a standard 1940 Act fund, so the tax paperwork differs from a stock ETF. Check how that lands on your return.
  • Mid-sized asset base and moderate turnover mean bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the giant index funds, and the payoff comes from price moves, not income.

Full HARD profile⁠

Full SOYB profile⁠

HARD vs SOYB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HARD vs SOYB Cost

Overpaying HARD vs SOYB

$3,840

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HARD 0.85%

    $16,199

  • SOYB 0.63%

    $12,359

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HARD 0.85%
  • SOYB 0.63%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HARD $16,199SOYB $12,359

Year by year

YearHARDSOYBOverpaying
10$1,508$1,128$380
20$5,706$4,311$1,395
30$16,199$12,359$3,840

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%HARD
  • 0.63%SOYB, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

SOYB 5th cheapest of 13 funds

HARD 9th cheapest of 13 funds

HARD vs SOYB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HARD 3.36%
SOYB No data
Payout (12M)
HARD $1.20
SOYB None
Last payment
HARD $0.30
SOYB No data
Ex-dividend
HARD Sep 25, 2026
SOYB No data
Paid on
HARD Sep 30, 2026
SOYB No data
Frequency
HARD Quarterly
SOYB No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

HARDQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll HARD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2023 $0.10; Sep 27, 2023 $0.10; Dec 26, 2023 $0.26; Mar 25, 2024 $0.15; Jun 25, 2024 $0.15; Sep 25, 2024 $0.30; Dec 23, 2024 $0.35; Mar 26, 2025 $0.12; Jun 25, 2025 $0.25; Sep 25, 2025 $0.30; Dec 23, 2025 $0.30; Mar 26, 2026 $0.30; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
SOYBAll SOYB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

HARD vs SOYB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HARD 17.2%SOYB 15.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HARD 0.80, betterSOYB −0.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HARD −21.0%since Mar 2023SOYB −31.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HARD 0.82SOYB 0.44

HARD and SOYB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • HARDCvsPDBCA

    Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsPDBCA

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HARDCvsWEATB

    Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsWEATB

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HARDCvsCMDTB

    Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF · PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsCMDTB

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.