SOYB ranks 2nd and HARD 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
HARD vs SOYB
SOYB −0.22pt a year
0.85%0.63%
SOYB 2.2×the volume
31.3K68.9K
HARD +19.8pt
+18.2%−1.6%
HARD vs SOYB Performance
+25.0%+13.0%
- HARD 0.85%
- SOYB 0.63%, better
- HARD $59M
- SOYB $39M
- HARD +25.0%, better
- SOYB +13.0%
- HARD 3.36%
- SOYB
- HARD 20
- SOYB 12
- HARD 31.3K sh
- SOYB 68.9K sh, better
- HARD $35.92
- SOYB $26.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HARD | SOYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | B69Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C54Higher | C49 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. HARD and SOYB are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HARDC
SOYBB
In short
HARD Most broad commodity funds buy the basket and hold on. HARD runs a systematic long/short model built by Altis Partners across the futures complex, and mails a 1099 instead of a K-1.
SOYB Soybeans, straight up. Since 2011 SOYB has tracked a benchmark of soybean futures for future delivery, wrapped so you can buy the bean in an ordinary brokerage account, and it charges less than the typical commodity futures fund.
Stated mandate
HARD HARD seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models designed by Altis Partners to pursue commodity exposure across inflationary and typical market environments.
SOYB SOYB seeks to track daily changes in the soybean market for future delivery through its benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HARD vs SOYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HARD vs SOYB Cost
Overpaying HARD vs SOYB
$3,840
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HARD 0.85%
$16,199
SOYB 0.63%
$12,359
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HARD | SOYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,128 | $380 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,311 | $1,395 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $12,359 | $3,840 |
- 0.85%HARD
- 0.63%SOYB, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
SOYB 5th cheapest of 13 funds
HARD 9th cheapest of 13 funds
HARD vs SOYB Dividends
- HARD 3.36%
- SOYB
- HARD $1.20
- SOYB None
- HARD $0.30
- SOYB
- HARD Sep 25, 2026
- SOYB
- HARD Sep 30, 2026
- SOYB
- HARD Quarterly
- SOYB
Distribution history
HARD vs SOYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HARD 17.2%SOYB 15.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HARD 0.80, betterSOYB −0.33
- Worst fall
- HARD −21.0%SOYB −31.0%
- Market sensitivity
- HARD 0.82SOYB 0.44
HARD and SOYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




