WEAT ranks 2nd and HARD 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
HARD vs WEAT
WEAT −0.23pt a year
0.85%0.62%
WEAT 17.2×the volume
31.3K538K
HARD +26.0pt
+18.2%−7.8%
HARD vs WEAT Performance
+25.0%+4.7%
- HARD 0.85%
- WEAT 0.62%, better
- HARD $59M
- WEAT $234M
- HARD +25.0%, better
- WEAT +4.7%
- HARD 3.36%
- WEAT
- HARD 20
- WEAT 31
- HARD 31.3K sh
- WEAT 538K sh, better
- HARD $35.92
- WEAT $22.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HARD | WEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | D39 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C54 | B61Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. HARD and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HARDC
WEATB
In short
HARD Most broad commodity funds buy the basket and hold on. HARD runs a systematic long/short model built by Altis Partners across the futures complex, and mails a 1099 instead of a K-1.
WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.
Stated mandate
HARD HARD seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic investment in commodity futures. Its strategy uses systematic long/short models designed by Altis Partners to pursue commodity exposure across inflationary and typical market environments.
WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HARD vs WEAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HARD vs WEAT Cost
Overpaying HARD vs WEAT
$4,020
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HARD 0.85%
$16,199
WEAT 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HARD | WEAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,111 | $397 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,246 | $1,460 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $12,179 | $4,020 |
- 0.85%HARD
- 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds
HARD 9th cheapest of 13 funds
HARD vs WEAT Dividends
- HARD 3.36%
- WEAT
- HARD $1.20
- WEAT None
- HARD $0.30
- WEAT
- HARD Sep 25, 2026
- WEAT
- HARD Sep 30, 2026
- WEAT
- HARD Quarterly
- WEAT
Distribution history
HARD vs WEAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HARD 17.2%, betterWEAT 22.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- HARD 0.80, betterWEAT −0.46
- Worst fall
- HARD −21.0%WEAT −67.8%
- Market sensitivity
- HARD 0.82WEAT 0.68
HARD and WEAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




