Skip to content

CNEQ vs GUSE

Alger Concentrated Equity ETF

CNEQCNYSE Arca

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.26pt a year

CNEQ0.56%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

CNEQ 8.1×the volume

CNEQ202KGUSE24.9K

CNEQ vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+6.2%CNEQ+11.3%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CNEQ +6.2%. GUSE +11.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%20%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CNEQ 0.56%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
CNEQ $6.31B
GUSE $413M
1Y total return
CNEQ +1.5%
GUSE No data
Yield (12M)
CNEQ 0.49%
GUSE No data
Holdings
CNEQ 31
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
CNEQ 202K sh, better
GUSE 24.9K sh
NAV per share
CNEQ $36.45
GUSE $45.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CNEQ: Cost 47, Risk 28, Mission 35, Tradability 61, Holdings 28, Durability 81. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for CNEQ, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCNEQGUSE
Cost30% weightC47A97Higher
Mission25% weightD35Not scored
Risk15% weightD28A94Higher
Tradability15% weightB61HigherC46
Holdings10% weightD28A89Higher
Durability5% weightA81A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CNEQ and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and CNEQ 54th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 54CBGROiShares Large Cap Growth Active ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 54CCNEQAlger Concentrated Equity ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 54CCWSAdvisorShares Focused Equity ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CNEQCAlger Concentrated Equity ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

CNEQ Most active US equity funds spread their bets across hundreds of names. Alger caps this one at 30, picked by fundamental research, and accepts non-diversified status to do it. Conviction investing, with the swings that come with it.

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

CNEQ The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a focused portfolio of no more than 30 companies selected using fundamental research.

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

  • CNEQ The 30-name ceiling is written into the mandate, not a style preference. You get the analysts' highest-conviction picks from fundamental research rather than a benchmark with a few tilts bolted on.
  • Costs 0.56% net of a waiver through December 31, 2027 (0.66% gross), which sits near the category median instead of the premium end you might expect from a hand-picked 30-stock book.
  • Despite a 2024 launch, it already runs multi-billion-dollar assets and trades with reasonable regularity, so buyers aren't wrestling a thin, fragile ticker.
  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • CNEQ Concentration cuts both ways. With fewer than 30 positions and non-diversified status, one stumbling name lands far harder here than in a broad index fund, and results can stray from the benchmark.yahoo.com
  • Cheaper options share the shelf: JUSA and FELG each charge 0.18%, no waiver involved, though both run far broader, more index-aware portfolios.
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short. There's no full market cycle yet to show how a 30-stock growth book behaves when leadership rotates away from it.
  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full CNEQ profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

CNEQ vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CNEQ vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying CNEQ vs GUSE

$4,939

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CNEQ 0.56%

    $11,088

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CNEQ 0.56%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530CNEQ $11,088GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearCNEQGUSEOverpaying
10$1,006$545$461
20$3,855$2,113$1,742
30$11,088$6,149$4,939

Expense ratio

  • 0.56%CNEQ
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

CNEQ 47th cheapest of 90 funds

CNEQ vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CNEQ 0.49%
GUSE No data
Payout (12M)
CNEQ $0.18
GUSE No data
Last payment
CNEQ $0.18
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
CNEQ Dec 18, 2025
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
CNEQ Dec 31, 2025
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
CNEQ Irregular
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

CNEQIrregular · 2 paymentsAll CNEQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2024 $0.04; Dec 18, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

CNEQ vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CNEQ 23.9%since May 2024GUSE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CNEQ 1.08since May 2024GUSE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CNEQ −27.6%since Apr 2024GUSE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CNEQ 1.71GUSE 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • CNEQCvsJUSAA

    Alger Concentrated Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CNEQCvsLRGCA

    Alger Concentrated Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CNEQCvsFELGA

    Alger Concentrated Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.