GUSE ranks 2nd and CNEQ 54th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
CNEQ vs GUSE
GUSE −0.26pt a year
0.56%0.30%
CNEQ 8.1×the volume
202K24.9K
CNEQ vs GUSE Performance
+6.2%+11.3%
- CNEQ 0.56%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- CNEQ $6.31B
- GUSE $413M
- CNEQ +1.5%
- GUSE
- CNEQ 0.49%
- GUSE
- CNEQ 31
- GUSE 122
- CNEQ 202K sh, better
- GUSE 24.9K sh
- CNEQ $36.45
- GUSE $45.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNEQ | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A97Higher |
| Mission | D35 | |
| Risk | D28 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | D28 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. CNEQ and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNEQC
GUSEA
In short
CNEQ Most active US equity funds spread their bets across hundreds of names. Alger caps this one at 30, picked by fundamental research, and accepts non-diversified status to do it. Conviction investing, with the swings that come with it.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
CNEQ The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a focused portfolio of no more than 30 companies selected using fundamental research.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNEQ vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNEQ vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying CNEQ vs GUSE
$4,939
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNEQ 0.56%
$11,088
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNEQ | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $545 | $461 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $2,113 | $1,742 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $6,149 | $4,939 |
- 0.56%CNEQ
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
CNEQ 47th cheapest of 90 funds
CNEQ vs GUSE Dividends
- CNEQ 0.49%
- GUSE
- CNEQ $0.18
- GUSE
- CNEQ $0.18
- GUSE $0.30
- CNEQ Dec 18, 2025
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- CNEQ Dec 31, 2025
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- CNEQ Irregular
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
CNEQ vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNEQ 23.9%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- CNEQ 1.08GUSE
- Worst fall
- CNEQ −27.6%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- CNEQ 1.71GUSE 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.