LRGC ranks 3rd and CNEQ 54th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
CNEQ vs LRGC
LRGC −0.17pt a year
0.56%0.39%
CNEQ 5.9×the volume
202K34.1K
CNEQ vs LRGC Performance
+1.5%+9.2%
- CNEQ 0.56%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- CNEQ $6.31B
- LRGC $1.35B
- CNEQ +1.5%
- LRGC +9.2%, better
- CNEQ 0.49%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- CNEQ 31
- LRGC 72
- CNEQ 202K sh, better
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- CNEQ $36.45
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNEQ | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A82Higher |
| Mission | D35 | A79Higher |
| Risk | D28 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A78 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. CNEQ and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNEQC
LRGCA
In short
CNEQ Most active US equity funds spread their bets across hundreds of names. Alger caps this one at 30, picked by fundamental research, and accepts non-diversified status to do it. Conviction investing, with the swings that come with it.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
CNEQ The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a focused portfolio of no more than 30 companies selected using fundamental research.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNEQ vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNEQ vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying CNEQ vs LRGC
$3,190
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNEQ 0.56%
$11,088
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNEQ | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $705 | $301 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $2,725 | $1,130 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $7,898 | $3,190 |
- 0.56%CNEQ
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
CNEQ 47th cheapest of 90 funds
CNEQ vs LRGC Dividends
- CNEQ 0.49%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- CNEQ $0.18
- LRGC $0.45
- CNEQ $0.18
- LRGC $0.45
- CNEQ Dec 18, 2025
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- CNEQ Dec 31, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- CNEQ Irregular
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
CNEQ vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNEQ 23.9%LRGC 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CNEQ 1.08LRGC 1.26
- Worst fall
- CNEQ −27.6%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CNEQ 1.71LRGC 1.00
CNEQ and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
