FLCH ranks 2nd and CNYA 7th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CNYA vs FLCH
FLCH −0.41pt a year
0.60%0.19%
FLCH 2.3×the volume
47.2K108K
FLCH +0.3pt
−4.4%−4.1%
CNYA vs FLCH Performance
−20.2%−18.7%
- CNYA 0.60%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- CNYA $158M
- FLCH $252M
- CNYA −9.6%, better
- FLCH −20.9%
- CNYA 2.13%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- CNYA 419
- FLCH 1112
- CNYA 47.2K sh
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- CNYA $30.59
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNYA | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A87 |
| Risk | B67Higher | B64 |
| Tradability | C43 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A77Higher | A70 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CNYA and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNYAA
FLCHA
In short
CNYA Most China ETFs buy the offshore listings. CNYA goes onshore, owning the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares that mainland investors trade, through an MSCI index built around the Stock Connect channel.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
CNYA The Fund seeks to track an index of domestic Chinese equities traded on the Shanghai or Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNYA vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNYA vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying CNYA vs FLCH
$7,865
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNYA 0.60%
$11,817
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNYA | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $347 | $729 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $1,351 | $2,765 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $3,952 | $7,865 |
- 0.60%CNYA
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
CNYA 9th cheapest of 28 funds
CNYA vs FLCH Dividends
- CNYA 2.13%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- CNYA $0.65
- FLCH $0.51
- CNYA $0.10
- FLCH $0.14
- CNYA Jun 15, 2026
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- CNYA Jun 18, 2026
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- CNYA Twice a year
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
CNYA vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CNYA
- FLCH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNYA 20.2%, betterFLCH 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CNYA 0.21FLCH 0.29, better
- Worst fall
- CNYA −44.6%, betterFLCH −48.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CNYA 0.60FLCH 0.55
CNYA and FLCH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
