MLPX ranks 2nd and COAL 7th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.
COAL vs MLPX
MLPX −0.40pt a year
0.85%0.45%
MLPX 9.8×the volume
38.3K375K
COAL vs MLPX Performance
+5.6%+32.8%
- COAL 0.85%
- MLPX 0.45%, better
- COAL $54M
- MLPX $3.8B
- COAL +5.6%
- MLPX +32.8%, better
- COAL 2.56%
- MLPX 4.12%, better
- COAL 30
- MLPX 31
- COAL 38.3K sh
- MLPX 375K sh, better
- COAL $24.07
- MLPX $76.71
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COAL | MLPX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A71Higher |
| Mission | D32 | |
| Risk | F19 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | F18 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C52Higher | C44 |
| Durability | D37 | A71Higher |
Rank among Energy Sector funds
Same Category. COAL and MLPX are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COALF
MLPXB
In short
COAL Coal, and only coal. Most energy ETFs blend oil, gas and pipelines; this 2024 launch tracks a global coal index instead, giving the fuel its own line item.
MLPX A focused bet on the toll roads of American energy: roughly 30 pipeline and infrastructure names tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, running since 2013 at 0.45% a year.
Stated mandate
COAL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Range Global Coal Index.
MLPX The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COAL vs MLPX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COAL vs MLPX Cost
Overpaying COAL vs MLPX
$7,158
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COAL 0.85%
$16,199
MLPX 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COAL | MLPX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $812 | $696 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,128 | $2,578 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,041 | $7,158 |
- 0.85%COAL
- 0.45%MLPX, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Sector funds
- Median 0.63%
MLPX 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
COAL 6th cheapest of 7 funds
COAL vs MLPX Dividends
- COAL 2.56%
- MLPX 4.12%, better
- COAL $0.60
- MLPX $3.07
- COAL $0.60
- MLPX $0.76
- COAL Dec 30, 2025
- MLPX Aug 10, 2026
- COAL Dec 31, 2025
- MLPX Aug 13, 2026
- COAL Irregular
- MLPX Quarterly
Distribution history
COAL vs MLPX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COAL 28.5%MLPX 16.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- COAL −0.03MLPX 1.32
- Worst fall
- COAL −42.3%MLPX −19.7%
- Market sensitivity
- COAL 0.16MLPX 0.28
COAL and MLPX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
