Skip to content

COAL vs TMLP

Range Global Coal Index ETF

COALFNYSE Arca

Tortoise MLP ETF

TMLPCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TMLP −0.35pt a year

COAL0.85%TMLP0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

COAL 14.6×the volume

COAL38.3KTMLP2.62K

COAL vs TMLP Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+2.8%COAL+19.2%TMLP

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. COAL +2.8%. TMLP +19.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%15%25%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
COAL 0.85%
TMLP 0.50%, better
Fund size
COAL $54M
TMLP $37M
1Y total return
COAL +5.6%
TMLP No data
Yield (12M)
COAL 2.56%
TMLP No data
Holdings
COAL 30
TMLP 4
Avg volume (30D)
COAL 38.3K sh, better
TMLP 2.62K sh
NAV per share
COAL $24.07
TMLP $28.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COAL: Cost 20, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings 52, Durability 37. TMLP: Cost 59, Risk 59, Mission 60, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for COAL, TMLP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOALTMLP
Cost30% weightF20B59Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredB60
Risk15% weightF19B59Higher
Tradability15% weightF18D30Higher
Holdings10% weightC52Not scored
Durability5% weightD37HigherD33

Rank among Energy Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COAL and TMLP are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Energy Sector⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

TMLP ranks 3rd and COAL 7th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1BXESState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETFScore 61
  2. Rank 2BMLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CTMLPTortoise MLP ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CPXJInvesco Oil & Gas Services ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 6CAMLPAlerian MLP ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 7FCOALRange Global Coal Index ETFScore 24

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COALFRange Global Coal Index ETF

TMLPCTortoise MLP ETF

In short

COAL Coal, and only coal. Most energy ETFs blend oil, gas and pipelines; this 2024 launch tracks a global coal index instead, giving the fuel its own line item.

TMLP MLP exposure without the K-1 envelope. TMLP takes its index exposure through total return swaps inside a RIC structure, so shareholders get a single Form 1099 and skip the fund-level deferred tax accrual that C-corp MLP funds carry.

Stated mandate

COAL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Range Global Coal Index.

TMLP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Tortoise MLP Index SM.

Why people hold it

  • COAL A pure play: it tracks the Range Global Coal Index rather than diluting the theme with oil, gas and midstream names the way most energy sector funds do.
  • Rules over hunches. It is an index-tracking stock fund in a standard 1940 Act wrapper, so what it owns follows a published methodology.
  • The mandate is global, not US-only, so the coal exposure is not tied to a single country's producers.
  • TMLP Full MLP index exposure via total return swaps in a RIC wrapper: one Form 1099, no K-1s, and none of the fund-level deferred tax liability legacy C-corp MLP funds accrue.tortoisecapital.com
  • Tracks the Tortoise MLP Index, a rules-based benchmark with a 10-plus year history covering 20-some partnerships across energy transport, processing and storage.tortoisecapital.com
  • Home-field advantage: Tortoise launched the first MLP closed-end fund in 2004 and built this index itself rather than licensing someone else's.tortoisecapital.com
  • Pays quarterly, with distributions designed to line up with the cash-generating profile of the index's underlying MLPs.tortoisecapital.com

Worth knowing

  • COAL The 0.85% fee sits at the back of the energy ETF pack, above cheaper neighbors like XES (0.35%) and MLPX (0.45%).
  • One industry, one commodity. Coal equities can swing harder than diversified energy funds, with no oil or pipeline ballast to soften the ride.
  • Young and small: launched in 2024 with a modest asset base, and it distributes once or twice a year rather than quarterly.
  • TMLP 0.50% a year sits a bit above the typical index-tracking ETF. That's the toll for the swap-based, K-1-free plumbing.
  • Swaps carry counterparty risk. The fund may deal with one or a limited number of counterparties, and a counterparty default would reduce the value of your shares.tortoisecapital.com
  • A December 2025 launch: still small and thinly traded, and non-diversified, so spreads can be wider and a short list of names drives the ride.tortoisecapital.com

Full COAL profile⁠

Full TMLP profile⁠

COAL vs TMLP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COAL vs TMLP Cost

Overpaying COAL vs TMLP

$6,220

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COAL 0.85%

    $16,199

  • TMLP 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COAL 0.85%
  • TMLP 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530COAL $16,199TMLP $9,979

Year by year

YearCOALTMLPOverpaying
10$1,508$900$608
20$5,706$3,460$2,246
30$16,199$9,979$6,220

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%COAL
  • 0.50%TMLP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Energy Sector funds
  • Median 0.63%

TMLP 3rd cheapest of 7 funds

COAL 6th cheapest of 7 funds

COAL vs TMLP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
COAL 2.56%
TMLP No data
Payout (12M)
COAL $0.60
TMLP No data
Last payment
COAL $0.60
TMLP $0.58
Ex-dividend
COAL Dec 30, 2025
TMLP Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
COAL Dec 31, 2025
TMLP Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
COAL Irregular
TMLP Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

COALIrregular · 2 paymentsAll COAL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.37; Dec 30, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
TMLPQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll TMLP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.01; Mar 26, 2026 $0.58; Jun 25, 2026 $0.50; Sep 24, 2026 $0.58. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

COAL vs TMLP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COAL 28.5%since Feb 2024TMLP No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COAL −0.03since Feb 2024TMLP No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COAL −42.3%since Jan 2024TMLP No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COAL 0.16TMLP 0.06

Popular comparisons

  • COALFvsXESB

    Range Global Coal Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMLPCvsXESB

    Tortoise MLP ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COALFvsMLPXB

    Range Global Coal Index ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMLPCvsMLPXB

    Tortoise MLP ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COALFvsPXJC

    Range Global Coal Index ETF · Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMLPCvsPXJC

    Tortoise MLP ETF · Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.