Skip to content

COAL vs PXJ

Range Global Coal Index ETF

COALFNYSE Arca

Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

PXJCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PXJ −0.22pt a year

COAL0.85%PXJ0.63%

Avg volume · 30D

PXJ 1.5×the volume

COAL38.3KPXJ58.6K

COAL vs PXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.6%COAL+52.9%PXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. COAL +5.6%. PXJ +52.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
COAL 0.85%
PXJ 0.63%, better
Fund size
COAL $54M
PXJ $139M
1Y total return
COAL +5.6%
PXJ +52.9%, better
Yield (12M)
COAL 2.56%
PXJ 2.79%, better
Holdings
COAL 30
PXJ 33
Avg volume (30D)
COAL 38.3K sh
PXJ 58.6K sh, better
NAV per share
COAL $24.07
PXJ $46.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COAL: Cost 20, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings 52, Durability 37. PXJ: Cost 45, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 73, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for COAL, PXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOALPXJ
Cost30% weightF20C45Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF19C46Higher
Tradability15% weightF18B58Higher
Holdings10% weightC52A73Higher
Durability5% weightD37B55Higher

Rank among Energy Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COAL and PXJ are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Energy Sector⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

PXJ ranks 4th and COAL 7th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1BXESState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETFScore 61
  2. Rank 2BMLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CTMLPTortoise MLP ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CPXJInvesco Oil & Gas Services ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 5CMDSTWestwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETFScore 43
  6. Rank 6CAMLPAlerian MLP ETFScore 42
  7. Rank 7FCOALRange Global Coal Index ETFScore 24

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COALFRange Global Coal Index ETF

PXJCInvesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

In short

COAL Coal, and only coal. Most energy ETFs blend oil, gas and pipelines; this 2024 launch tracks a global coal index instead, giving the fuel its own line item.

PXJ Oilfield services run through a quant filter: PXJ's index ranks drillers, equipment makers and service firms on momentum, quality and value, then holds about 30. Trading since 2005, at 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.

Stated mandate

COAL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Range Global Coal Index.

PXJ The Fund tracks the Dynamic Oil Services Intellidex Index by normally investing at least 90% of total assets in its constituent common stocks. The index targets 30 U.S. companies supporting oil and gas production, processing, and distribution.

Why people hold it

  • COAL A pure play: it tracks the Range Global Coal Index rather than diluting the theme with oil, gas and midstream names the way most energy sector funds do.
  • Rules over hunches. It is an index-tracking stock fund in a standard 1940 Act wrapper, so what it owns follows a published methodology.
  • The mandate is global, not US-only, so the coal exposure is not tied to a single country's producers.
  • PXJ Not a cap-weighted mirror. The index scores candidates on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action and value, then reconstitutes four times a year.invesco.com
  • Weight spreads across size tiers rather than piling into the biggest service names, leaving more room for mid- and small-cap drillers than a cap-weighted build.sec.gov
  • Listed in 2005, it has traded through multiple drilling booms and busts, holding about 30 US companies that support oil and gas production, processing and distribution.

Worth knowing

  • COAL The 0.85% fee sits at the back of the energy ETF pack, above cheaper neighbors like XES (0.35%) and MLPX (0.45%).
  • One industry, one commodity. Coal equities can swing harder than diversified energy funds, with no oil or pipeline ballast to soften the ride.
  • Young and small: launched in 2024 with a modest asset base, and it distributes once or twice a year rather than quarterly.
  • PXJ 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028, near the energy-sector median. Gross is 0.77%, so the cost steps up if that waiver is not extended.
  • Cheaper routes into the niche exist: XES charges 0.35%, with no waiver attached. The quant screen is what the difference buys.
  • About 30 stocks in one cyclical industry, tracking drilling and completion budgets more than the broad energy complex, with moderate volume rather than mega-fund liquidity.

Full COAL profile⁠

Full PXJ profile⁠

COAL vs PXJ Holdings

How COAL and PXJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of COAL and 0.0% of PXJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile43.5%
  • Sector4 Sectors53.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in COAL and PXJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in COALMore in PXJ
EnergyPXJ +47.0 points
MaterialsCOAL +41.1 points
IndustrialsCOAL +5.0 points
UtilitiesCOAL +1.0 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in COAL and PXJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in COALMore in PXJ
United StatesPXJ +49.6 points
AustraliaCOAL +34.4 points
South AfricaCOAL +5.7 points
CanadaCOAL +4.9 points
SwitzerlandCOAL +4.0 points
GreecePXJ +3.9 points
PolandCOAL +3.4 points
ChinaCOAL +3.2 points
Other countries (2)PXJ +2.0 points

Outside the US: COAL 78% developed, 22% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • COAL62.1%
  • PXJ47.3%

Securities held

  • COAL29
  • PXJ32

Asset class

COAL
Equity
PXJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in COAL29
  • In both0
  • Only in PXJ32

Only in COAL

29 securities, 98.8% of COAL by weight

  • Warrior Met Coal Inc9.60%
  • Yancoal Australia Ltd8.38%
  • Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc6.89%

Only in PXJ

32 securities, 100% of PXJ by weight

  • Frontline PLC6.37%
  • Halliburton Co5.13%
  • Noble Corp PLC5.12%

Weight gaps

COAL and PXJ share no securities.

All 30 COAL holdings⁠All 31 PXJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COAL vs PXJ Cost

Overpaying COAL vs PXJ

$3,840

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COAL 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PXJ 0.63%

    $12,359

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COAL 0.85%
  • PXJ 0.63%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530COAL $16,199PXJ $12,359

Year by year

YearCOALPXJOverpaying
10$1,508$1,128$380
20$5,706$4,311$1,395
30$16,199$12,359$3,840

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%COAL
  • 0.63%PXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Energy Sector funds
  • Median 0.63%

PXJ 4th cheapest of 7 funds

COAL 6th cheapest of 7 funds

COAL vs PXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
COAL 2.56%
PXJ 2.79%, better
Payout (12M)
COAL $0.60
PXJ $1.23
Last payment
COAL $0.60
PXJ $0.44
Ex-dividend
COAL Dec 30, 2025
PXJ Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
COAL Dec 31, 2025
PXJ Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
COAL Irregular
PXJ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

COALIrregular · 2 paymentsAll COAL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.37; Dec 30, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
PXJQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll PXJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.12; Sep 18, 2017 $0.21; Dec 18, 2017 $0.99; Jun 18, 2018 $0.14; Sep 24, 2018 $0.09; Dec 24, 2018 $0.07; Mar 18, 2019 $0.29; Jun 24, 2019 $0.14; Sep 23, 2019 $0.09; Dec 23, 2019 $0.09; Mar 23, 2020 $0.29; Jun 22, 2020 $0.14; Sep 21, 2020 $0.13; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Jun 21, 2021 $0.03; Sep 20, 2021 $0.03; Mar 21, 2022 $0.01; Jun 21, 2022 $0.04; Sep 19, 2022 $0.04; Dec 19, 2022 $0.08; Mar 20, 2023 $0.07; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.21; Dec 18, 2023 $0.15; Mar 18, 2024 $0.10; Jun 24, 2024 $0.36; Sep 23, 2024 $0.26; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.26; Sep 22, 2025 $0.22; Dec 22, 2025 $0.25; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.33; Sep 21, 2026 $0.44. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

COAL vs PXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COAL 28.5%since Feb 2024PXJ 27.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COAL −0.03since Feb 2024PXJ 0.64
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COAL −42.3%since Jan 2024PXJ −40.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COAL 0.16PXJ 0.65

Popular comparisons

  • COALFvsXESB

    Range Global Coal Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsXESB

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COALFvsMLPXB

    Range Global Coal Index ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsMLPXB

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COALFvsTMLPC

    Range Global Coal Index ETF · Tortoise MLP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsTMLPC

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · Tortoise MLP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.