Skip to content

COLO vs EWM

Global X MSCI Colombia ETF

COLODNYSE Arca

iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF

EWMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

EWM −0.12pt a year

COLO0.62%EWM0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

EWM 1.5×the volume

COLO142KEWM214K

10Y return · a year

COLO +5.1pt

COLO+7.5%EWM+2.4%

COLO vs EWM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+113.7%COLO+23.7%EWM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. COLO +113.7%. EWM +23.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%50%75%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
COLO 0.62%
EWM 0.50%, better
Fund size
COLO $176M
EWM $230M
1Y total return
COLO +42.0%, better
EWM +7.8%
Yield (12M)
COLO 4.22%, better
EWM 3.71%
Holdings
COLO 28
EWM 25
Avg volume (30D)
COLO 142K sh
EWM 214K sh, better
NAV per share
COLO $47.58
EWM $26.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COLO: Cost 19, Risk 77, Mission 38, Tradability 41, Holdings not scored, Durability 43. EWM: Cost 88, Risk 78, Mission 43, Tradability 55, Holdings 41, Durability 56.
Pillar letters and Scores for COLO, EWM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOLOEWM
Cost30% weightF19A88Higher
Mission25% weightD38C43Higher
Risk15% weightA77A78Higher
Tradability15% weightC41B55Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC41
Durability5% weightC43B56Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COLO and EWM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 21 ›

EWM ranks 4th and COLO 16th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.

  1. Rank 1AEWWiShares MSCI Mexico ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2BFLMXFranklin FTSE Mexico ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BEPOLiShares MSCI Poland ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 4BEWMiShares MSCI Malaysia ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BEZAiShares MSCI South Africa ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 14CKSAiShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 16DCOLOGlobal X MSCI Colombia ETFScore 39
  8. Rank 16DEPHEiShares MSCI Philippines ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COLODGlobal X MSCI Colombia ETF

EWMBiShares MSCI Malaysia ETF

In short

COLO Colombia, in one ticker. Running since 2009, COLO tracks an MSCI index of roughly two dozen Colombian stocks with capping rules that stop any single issuer from swallowing the fund. Concentrated by design, not by accident.

EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.

Stated mandate

COLO COLO seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index.

EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.

Why people hold it

  • COLO A pure Colombia play with history behind it: listed since 2009 and still tracking the country's equity market by holding the index itself.globalxetfs.com
  • The benchmark applies MSCI's 25/50 capping rules, a guardrail on how far one issuer can stretch inside a basket of roughly two dozen names.globalxetfs.com
  • No manager guesswork: it is passively run and fully replicates the index, and the adviser does not take defensive positions when the market falls.sec.gov
  • EWM Listed in 1996, which puts it among the oldest ETFs still trading. Nearly three decades of doing one job: hold Malaysian equities, track the index.ishares.com
  • 0.50% a year, under the median for its single-country emerging markets peer group and below iShares siblings EPOL and EZA at 0.59%.
  • Sits in the upper tier of the single-country emerging markets funds we grade, helped by a low fee and a milder volatility profile than much of that group.
  • No guesswork about the mandate: BlackRock builds it as a way to express a single-country view on Malaysian companies, and the index name is right on the tin.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • COLO At 0.62% a year it runs above the 0.59% median for single-country emerging market funds, and far above the cheapest of them (FLMX charges 0.19%).
  • One country, a couple dozen stocks, and officially non-diversified: single-name, peso and political swings land with full force here.globalxetfs.com
  • Assets are modest and trading is moderate by ETF standards, which usually means wider spreads than the giants of the single-country shelf.
  • EWM Market-cap weighting in a modest-sized market means a short list of Kuala Lumpur heavyweights drives most of the fund's day-to-day move.stockanalysis.com
  • One country, one currency. The holdings trade in ringgit and the fund is unhedged, so currency moves against the dollar land in your return alongside the stocks.ishares.com
  • Volume is moderate rather than deep, and payouts arrive once or twice a year instead of quarterly. Limit orders are the friendlier way in and out.

Full COLO profile⁠

Full EWM profile⁠

COLO vs EWM Holdings

As of

How COLO and EWM differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of COLO and 0.0% of EWM.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector9 Sectors74.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in COLO and EWM, widest gap first
SectorMore in COLOMore in EWM
EnergyCOLO +12.2 points
FinancialsEWM +7.9 points
UtilitiesCOLO +6.0 points
Consumer StaplesEWM +5.9 points
IndustrialsEWM +5.9 points
MaterialsCOLO +5.4 points
Health CareEWM +3.0 points
CommunicationEWM +2.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryCOLO +2.0 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in COLO and EWM, widest gap first
CountryMore in COLOMore in EWM
MalaysiaEWM +100.0 points
ColombiaCOLO +86.9 points
CanadaCOLO +7.0 points
United StatesCOLO +3.5 points
ChileCOLO +2.6 points

Outside the US: COLO 7% developed, 93% emerging. EWM 0% developed, 100% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • COLO65.0%
  • EWM72.0%

Securities held

  • COLO26
  • EWM22

Asset class

COLO
Equity
EWM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in COLO26
  • In both0
  • Only in EWM22

Only in COLO

26 securities, 99.6% of COLO by weight

  • Grupo Cibest SA21.65%
  • Interconexion Electrica SA7.62%
  • Ecopetrol SA7.53%

Only in EWM

22 securities, 99.8% of EWM by weight

  • Public Bank16.00%
  • Cimb Group Holdings12.53%
  • Malayan Banking11.21%

Weight gaps

COLO and EWM share no securities.

All 26 COLO holdings⁠All 21 EWM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COLO vs EWM Cost

Overpaying COLO vs EWM

$2,200

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COLO 0.62%

    $12,179

  • EWM 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COLO 0.62%
  • EWM 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530COLO $12,179EWM $9,979

Year by year

YearCOLOEWMOverpaying
10$1,111$900$211
20$4,246$3,460$786
30$12,179$9,979$2,200

Expense ratio

  • 0.62%COLO
  • 0.50%EWM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
  • Median 0.59%

EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds

COLO 18th cheapest of 21 funds

COLO vs EWM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
COLO 4.22%, better
EWM 3.71%
Payout (12M)
COLO $2.00
EWM $1.00
Last payment
COLO $0.17
EWM $0.57
Ex-dividend
COLO Jun 29, 2026
EWM Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
COLO Jul 7, 2026
EWM Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
COLO Twice a year
EWM Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

COLOTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll COLO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.73; Dec 28, 2018 $0.94; Jun 27, 2019 $0.61; Dec 30, 2019 $0.58; Jun 29, 2020 $0.46; Dec 30, 2020 $0.58; Jun 29, 2021 $0.28; Dec 30, 2021 $0.37; Jun 29, 2022 $1.48; Dec 29, 2022 $1.01; Jun 29, 2023 $0.42; Dec 28, 2023 $1.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Dec 30, 2024 $1.00; Jun 27, 2025 $0.85; Dec 30, 2025 $1.83; Jun 29, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
EWMTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll EWM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.35; Dec 19, 2017 $1.49; Jun 19, 2018 $0.64; Dec 18, 2018 $0.51; Jun 17, 2019 $0.52; Dec 16, 2019 $0.31; Jun 15, 2020 $0.54; Jun 10, 2021 $0.84; Dec 13, 2021 $0.78; Jun 9, 2022 $0.47; Dec 13, 2022 $0.22; Jun 7, 2023 $0.37; Dec 20, 2023 $0.37; Jun 11, 2024 $0.36; Dec 17, 2024 $0.45; Jun 16, 2025 $0.51; Dec 16, 2025 $0.43; Jun 15, 2026 $0.57. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

COLO vs EWM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • COLO
  • EWM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: COLO −43.9% · Mar 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COLO 18.9%EWM 13.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COLO 1.73, betterEWM 0.68
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COLO −43.9%EWM −22.2%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COLO 0.61EWM 0.46

COLO and EWM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • COLODvsEWWA

    Global X MSCI Colombia ETF · iShares MSCI Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWMBvsEWWA

    iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF · iShares MSCI Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COLODvsFLMXB

    Global X MSCI Colombia ETF · Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWMBvsFLMXB

    iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF · Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COLODvsEPOLB

    Global X MSCI Colombia ETF · iShares MSCI Poland ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWMBvsEPOLB

    iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF · iShares MSCI Poland ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.