EWW ranks 1st and COLO 16th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
COLO vs EWW
EWW −0.12pt a year
0.62%0.50%
EWW 8.2×the volume
142K1.16M
COLO +0.8pt
+7.5%+6.7%
COLO vs EWW Performance
+113.7%+81.4%
- COLO 0.62%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- COLO $176M
- EWW $1.56B
- COLO +42.0%, better
- EWW +15.8%
- COLO 4.22%, better
- EWW 3.31%
- COLO 28
- EWW 42
- COLO 142K sh
- EWW 1.16M sh, better
- COLO $47.58
- EWW $74.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COLO | EWW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A88Higher |
| Mission | D38 | B67Higher |
| Risk | A77Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | C41 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | |
| Durability | C43 | A81Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. COLO and EWW are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COLOD
EWWA
In short
COLO Colombia, in one ticker. Running since 2009, COLO tracks an MSCI index of roughly two dozen Colombian stocks with capping rules that stop any single issuer from swallowing the fund. Concentrated by design, not by accident.
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
COLO COLO seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index.
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COLO vs EWW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COLO vs EWW Cost
Overpaying COLO vs EWW
$2,200
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COLO 0.62%
$12,179
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COLO | EWW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,111 | $900 | $211 |
| 20 | $4,246 | $3,460 | $786 |
| 30 | $12,179 | $9,979 | $2,200 |
- 0.62%COLO
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
COLO 18th cheapest of 21 funds
COLO vs EWW Dividends
- COLO 4.22%, better
- EWW 3.31%
- COLO $2.00
- EWW $2.46
- COLO $0.17
- EWW $1.14
- COLO Jun 29, 2026
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- COLO Jul 7, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- COLO Twice a year
- EWW Twice a year
Distribution history
COLO vs EWW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- COLO
- EWW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COLO 18.9%, betterEWW 20.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- COLO 1.73, betterEWW 0.56
- Worst fall
- COLO −43.9%EWW −31.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- COLO 0.61EWW 1.06
COLO and EWW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.62% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
