EPOL ranks 3rd and COLO 16th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
COLO vs EPOL
EPOL −0.03pt a year
0.62%0.59%
EPOL 2.9×the volume
142K415K
EPOL +4.4pt
+7.5%+11.9%
COLO vs EPOL Performance
+113.7%+123.6%
- COLO 0.62%
- EPOL 0.59%, better
- COLO $176M
- EPOL $1.03B
- COLO +42.0%, better
- EPOL +34.1%
- COLO 4.22%, better
- EPOL 3.39%
- COLO 28
- EPOL 37
- COLO 142K sh
- EPOL 415K sh, better
- COLO $47.58
- EPOL $43.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COLO | EPOL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | C50Higher |
| Mission | D38 | B63Higher |
| Risk | A77 | A77 |
| Tradability | C41 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | C43 | A79Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. COLO and EPOL are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COLOD
EPOLB
In short
COLO Colombia, in one ticker. Running since 2009, COLO tracks an MSCI index of roughly two dozen Colombian stocks with capping rules that stop any single issuer from swallowing the fund. Concentrated by design, not by accident.
EPOL Poland in one ticket. Running since 2010, EPOL holds roughly 30 Polish stocks under MSCI's 25/50 capping rules, and it sits in the upper tier of single-country emerging-market funds.
Stated mandate
COLO COLO seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index.
EPOL The fund seeks to track an index composed of Polish equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COLO vs EPOL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COLO vs EPOL Cost
Overpaying COLO vs EPOL
$544
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COLO 0.62%
$12,179
EPOL 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COLO | EPOL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,111 | $1,058 | $53 |
| 20 | $4,246 | $4,051 | $195 |
| 30 | $12,179 | $11,635 | $544 |
- 0.62%COLO
- 0.59%EPOL, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EPOL 7th cheapest of 21 funds
COLO 18th cheapest of 21 funds
COLO vs EPOL Dividends
- COLO 4.22%, better
- EPOL 3.39%
- COLO $2.00
- EPOL $1.47
- COLO $0.17
- EPOL $0.30
- COLO Jun 29, 2026
- EPOL Jun 15, 2026
- COLO Jul 7, 2026
- EPOL Jun 18, 2026
- COLO Twice a year
- EPOL Twice a year
Distribution history
COLO vs EPOL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- COLO
- EPOL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COLO 18.9%EPOL 17.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- COLO 1.73, betterEPOL 1.64
- Worst fall
- COLO −43.9%, betterEPOL −53.6%
- Market sensitivity
- COLO 0.61EPOL 0.70
COLO and EPOL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.62% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

