ROM ranks 3rd and COPZ 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
COPZ vs ROM
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.93%
ROM 2.0×the volume
23.3K47.7K
COPZ vs ROM Performance
−21.4%−3.8%
- COPZ 0.95%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- COPZ $5M
- ROM $1.15B
- COPZ
- ROM +19.3%
- COPZ
- ROM 0.03%
- COPZ 7
- ROM 85
- COPZ 23.3K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- COPZ $10.73
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COPZ | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | F24 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C42 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. COPZ and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COPZC
ROMA
In short
COPZ Copper miners, doubled. This fund aims to deliver twice the daily move of a global copper-miner stock basket, resetting each session. Its own documents call it a short-term, actively monitored tool, not a park-it holding.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
COPZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change in the share price of COPX, before fees and expenses. It is intended for short-term, actively monitored use rather than periods longer than one trading day.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COPZ vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COPZ vs ROM Cost
Overpaying COPZ vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COPZ 0.95%
$17,869
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COPZ | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,644 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,199 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,539 | $330 |
- 0.95%COPZ
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
COPZ 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
COPZ vs ROM Dividends
- COPZ
- ROM 0.03%
- COPZ None
- ROM $0.04
- COPZ
- ROM $0.02
- COPZ
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- COPZ
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- COPZ
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
COPZ vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COPZ ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- COPZ ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- COPZ ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- COPZ 3.51ROM 3.09
COPZ and ROM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
