FLCH ranks 2nd and CQQQ 14th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CQQQ vs FLCH
FLCH −0.46pt a year
0.65%0.19%
CQQQ 10.0×the volume
1.08M108K
FLCH +6.5pt
−10.6%−4.1%
CQQQ vs FLCH Performance
−42.9%−18.7%
- CQQQ 0.65%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- CQQQ $1.74B
- FLCH $252M
- CQQQ −31.2%
- FLCH −20.9%, better
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- FLCH 2.63%
- CQQQ 222
- FLCH 1112
- CQQQ 1.08M sh, better
- FLCH 108K sh
- CQQQ $37.62
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CQQQ | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | D27 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | F17 | B65Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A70 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CQQQ and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CQQQC
FLCHA
In short
CQQQ The tech sector, minus Silicon Valley. Trading since 2009, CQQQ tracks a FTSE index of Chinese technology companies, roughly 180 of them, instead of the US megacaps that fill almost every other tech fund.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
CQQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQQQ vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQQQ vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying CQQQ vs FLCH
$8,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQQQ 0.65%
$12,717
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQQQ | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $347 | $816 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,351 | $3,089 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,952 | $8,765 |
- 0.65%CQQQ
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ vs FLCH Dividends
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- FLCH 2.63%
- CQQQ $1.13
- FLCH $0.51
- CQQQ $1.13
- FLCH $0.14
- CQQQ Dec 22, 2025
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- CQQQ Dec 26, 2025
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- CQQQ Annual
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
CQQQ vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CQQQ
- FLCH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CQQQ 32.3%FLCH 21.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CQQQ 0.14FLCH 0.29, better
- Worst fall
- CQQQ −61.4%FLCH −48.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CQQQ 1.01FLCH 0.55
CQQQ and FLCH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

