Skip to content

CQQQ vs FLCH

Invesco China Technology ETF

CQQQCNYSE Arca

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.46pt a year

CQQQ0.65%FLCH0.19%

Avg volume · 30D

CQQQ 10.0×the volume

CQQQ1.08MFLCH108K

5Y return · a year

FLCH +6.5pt

CQQQ−10.6%FLCH−4.1%

CQQQ vs FLCH Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−42.9%CQQQ−18.7%FLCH

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CQQQ −42.9%. FLCH −18.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−30%−10%0%10%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CQQQ 0.65%
FLCH 0.19%, better
Fund size
CQQQ $1.74B
FLCH $252M
1Y total return
CQQQ −31.2%
FLCH −20.9%, better
Yield (12M)
CQQQ 2.98%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Holdings
CQQQ 222
FLCH 1112
Avg volume (30D)
CQQQ 1.08M sh, better
FLCH 108K sh
NAV per share
CQQQ $37.62
FLCH $19.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CQQQ: Cost 53, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 83, Holdings 17, Durability 83. FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for CQQQ, FLCH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCQQQFLCH
Cost30% weightC53A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA87
Risk15% weightD27B64Higher
Tradability15% weightA83HigherB62
Holdings10% weightF17B65Higher
Durability5% weightA83HigherA70

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CQQQ and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and CQQQ 14th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 13CCNXTVanEck ChiNext Innovators ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 14CCQQQInvesco China Technology ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 15CMCHMatthews China Active ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CQQQCInvesco China Technology ETF

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

In short

CQQQ The tech sector, minus Silicon Valley. Trading since 2009, CQQQ tracks a FTSE index of Chinese technology companies, roughly 180 of them, instead of the US megacaps that fill almost every other tech fund.

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

Stated mandate

CQQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index.

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

Why people hold it

  • CQQQ One of the original US-listed ways to own Chinese tech as a standalone sleeve: launched in 2009, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively.
  • Roughly 180 holdings spread across the sector, and the index reaches into mainland A-shares, not just the offshore-listed Chinese names most investors already know.
  • Undiluted by design: the mandate is Chinese technology only, so the exposure isn't watered down the way it is inside a global tech or broad emerging-markets fund.
  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CQQQ The 0.65% fee sits above the 0.40% median in its broad tech peer group, and well above index giants like VGT and XLK. That is the toll for a harder-to-reach market.
  • One country, one sector. Beijing policy shifts, currency moves and listing rules land on this portfolio much more directly than on a US-centric tech fund.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly or quarterly. This is a growth-sector vehicle, not an income one.
  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.

Full CQQQ profile⁠

Full FLCH profile⁠

CQQQ vs FLCH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CQQQ vs FLCH Cost

Overpaying CQQQ vs FLCH

$8,765

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CQQQ 0.65%

    $12,717

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CQQQ 0.65%
  • FLCH 0.19%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CQQQ $12,717FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearCQQQFLCHOverpaying
10$1,163$347$816
20$4,440$1,351$3,089
30$12,717$3,952$8,765

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CQQQ
  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

CQQQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds

CQQQ vs FLCH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CQQQ 2.98%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Payout (12M)
CQQQ $1.13
FLCH $0.51
Last payment
CQQQ $1.13
FLCH $0.14
Ex-dividend
CQQQ Dec 22, 2025
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
Paid on
CQQQ Dec 26, 2025
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
Frequency
CQQQ Annual
FLCH Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CQQQAnnual · 8 paymentsAll CQQQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.86; Dec 24, 2018 $0.17; Dec 23, 2019 $0.0053; Dec 21, 2020 $0.39; Dec 19, 2022 $0.03; Dec 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 23, 2024 $0.11; Dec 22, 2025 $1.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CQQQ vs FLCH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CQQQ
  • FLCH
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CQQQ −61.4% · Feb 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CQQQ 32.3%FLCH 21.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CQQQ 0.14FLCH 0.29, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CQQQ −61.4%FLCH −48.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CQQQ 1.01FLCH 0.55

CQQQ and FLCH in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CQQQCvsCXSEA

    Invesco China Technology ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQQQCvsMCHIA

    Invesco China Technology ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQQQCvsGXCA

    Invesco China Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.