GXC ranks 4th and CQQQ 14th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CQQQ vs GXC
GXC −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
CQQQ 46.3×the volume
1.08M23.4K
GXC +2.3pt
+0.3%+2.6%
CQQQ vs GXC Performance
−42.9%−18.2%
- CQQQ 0.65%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- CQQQ $1.74B
- GXC $421M
- CQQQ −31.2%
- GXC −19.1%, better
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- GXC 2.46%
- CQQQ 222
- GXC 1539
- CQQQ 1.08M sh, better
- GXC 23.4K sh
- CQQQ $37.62
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CQQQ | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | D27 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | F17 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CQQQ and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CQQQC
GXCA
In short
CQQQ The tech sector, minus Silicon Valley. Trading since 2009, CQQQ tracks a FTSE index of Chinese technology companies, roughly 180 of them, instead of the US megacaps that fill almost every other tech fund.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
CQQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQQQ vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQQQ vs GXC Cost
Overpaying CQQQ vs GXC
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQQQ 0.65%
$12,717
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQQQ | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%CQQQ
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ vs GXC Dividends
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- GXC 2.46%
- CQQQ $1.13
- GXC $1.99
- CQQQ $1.13
- GXC $0.67
- CQQQ Dec 22, 2025
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- CQQQ Dec 26, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- CQQQ Annual
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
CQQQ vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CQQQ
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CQQQ 32.3%GXC 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CQQQ 0.14GXC 0.27, better
- Worst fall
- CQQQ −61.4%GXC −46.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CQQQ 1.01GXC 0.69
CQQQ and GXC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

