CXSE ranks 1st and CQQQ 14th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CQQQ vs CXSE
CXSE −0.33pt a year
0.65%0.32%
CQQQ 29.2×the volume
1.08M37.2K
CXSE +2.8pt
+0.3%+3.1%
CQQQ vs CXSE Performance
−42.9%−39.0%
- CQQQ 0.65%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- CQQQ $1.74B
- CXSE $372M
- CQQQ −31.2%
- CXSE −24.9%, better
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- CQQQ 222
- CXSE 241
- CQQQ 1.08M sh, better
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- CQQQ $37.62
- CXSE $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CQQQ | CXSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D27 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | F17 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A79 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CQQQ and CXSE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CQQQC
CXSEA
In short
CQQQ The tech sector, minus Silicon Valley. Trading since 2009, CQQQ tracks a FTSE index of Chinese technology companies, roughly 180 of them, instead of the US megacaps that fill almost every other tech fund.
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
Stated mandate
CQQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index.
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQQQ vs CXSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQQQ vs CXSE Cost
Overpaying CQQQ vs CXSE
$6,175
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQQQ 0.65%
$12,717
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQQQ | CXSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $580 | $583 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,250 | $2,190 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $6,542 | $6,175 |
- 0.65%CQQQ
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ vs CXSE Dividends
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- CQQQ $1.13
- CXSE $0.69
- CQQQ $1.13
- CXSE $0.26
- CQQQ Dec 22, 2025
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- CQQQ Dec 26, 2025
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- CQQQ Annual
- CXSE Quarterly
Distribution history
CQQQ vs CXSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CQQQ
- CXSE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CQQQ 32.3%CXSE 24.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CQQQ 0.14, betterCXSE 0.12
- Worst fall
- CQQQ −61.4%CXSE −57.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CQQQ 1.01CXSE 0.75
CQQQ and CXSE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

