Skip to content

CQQQ vs CXSE

Invesco China Technology ETF

CQQQCNYSE Arca

WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

CXSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

CXSE −0.33pt a year

CQQQ0.65%CXSE0.32%

Avg volume · 30D

CQQQ 29.2×the volume

CQQQ1.08MCXSE37.2K

10Y return · a year

CXSE +2.8pt

CQQQ+0.3%CXSE+3.1%

CQQQ vs CXSE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−42.9%CQQQ−39.0%CXSE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CQQQ −42.9%. CXSE −39.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CQQQ 0.65%
CXSE 0.32%, better
Fund size
CQQQ $1.74B
CXSE $372M
1Y total return
CQQQ −31.2%
CXSE −24.9%, better
Yield (12M)
CQQQ 2.98%, better
CXSE 2.22%
Holdings
CQQQ 222
CXSE 241
Avg volume (30D)
CQQQ 1.08M sh, better
CXSE 37.2K sh
NAV per share
CQQQ $37.62
CXSE $31.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CQQQ: Cost 53, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 83, Holdings 17, Durability 83. CXSE: Cost 97, Risk 47, Mission 100, Tradability 63, Holdings 74, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for CQQQ, CXSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCQQQCXSE
Cost30% weightC53A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightD27C47Higher
Tradability15% weightA83HigherB63
Holdings10% weightF17A74Higher
Durability5% weightA83HigherA79

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CQQQ and CXSE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

CXSE ranks 1st and CQQQ 14th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 13CCNXTVanEck ChiNext Innovators ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 14CCQQQInvesco China Technology ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 15CMCHMatthews China Active ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CQQQCInvesco China Technology ETF

CXSEAWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

In short

CQQQ The tech sector, minus Silicon Valley. Trading since 2009, CQQQ tracks a FTSE index of Chinese technology companies, roughly 180 of them, instead of the US megacaps that fill almost every other tech fund.

CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.

Stated mandate

CQQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index.

CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.

Why people hold it

  • CQQQ One of the original US-listed ways to own Chinese tech as a standalone sleeve: launched in 2009, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively.
  • Roughly 180 holdings spread across the sector, and the index reaches into mainland A-shares, not just the offshore-listed Chinese names most investors already know.
  • Undiluted by design: the mandate is Chinese technology only, so the exposure isn't watered down the way it is inside a global tech or broad emerging-markets fund.
  • CXSE The whole design is one screen: state-controlled companies out, privately run ones in, about 200 of them. Not a broad China index with a tweak.
  • 0.32% a year, well under half the 0.70% median for single-country China funds.
  • Trading since 2012, and one of the tighter, more faithful builds in a crowded China cohort.

Worth knowing

  • CQQQ The 0.65% fee sits above the 0.40% median in its broad tech peer group, and well above index giants like VGT and XLK. That is the toll for a harder-to-reach market.
  • One country, one sector. Beijing policy shifts, currency moves and listing rules land on this portfolio much more directly than on a US-centric tech fund.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly or quarterly. This is a growth-sector vehicle, not an income one.
  • CXSE Thinly traded next to China heavyweights like MCHI and GXC, so limit orders matter more here.
  • One country, about 200 stocks, and none of the state-backed heavyweights as ballast. Swings run bigger than a diversified global fund's.
  • Cheap for the group, not the cheapest: FLCH (0.19%) and JCHI (0.15%) undercut it with different mandates.

Full CQQQ profile⁠

Full CXSE profile⁠

CQQQ vs CXSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CQQQ vs CXSE Cost

Overpaying CQQQ vs CXSE

$6,175

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CQQQ 0.65%

    $12,717

  • CXSE 0.32%

    $6,542

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CQQQ 0.65%
  • CXSE 0.32%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CQQQ $12,717CXSE $6,542

Year by year

YearCQQQCXSEOverpaying
10$1,163$580$583
20$4,440$2,250$2,190
30$12,717$6,542$6,175

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CQQQ
  • 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds

CQQQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds

CQQQ vs CXSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CQQQ 2.98%, better
CXSE 2.22%
Payout (12M)
CQQQ $1.13
CXSE $0.69
Last payment
CQQQ $1.13
CXSE $0.26
Ex-dividend
CQQQ Dec 22, 2025
CXSE Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
CQQQ Dec 26, 2025
CXSE Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
CQQQ Annual
CXSE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CQQQAnnual · 8 paymentsAll CQQQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.86; Dec 24, 2018 $0.17; Dec 23, 2019 $0.0053; Dec 21, 2020 $0.39; Dec 19, 2022 $0.03; Dec 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 23, 2024 $0.11; Dec 22, 2025 $1.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
CXSEQuarterly · 31 paymentsAll CXSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 31 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 26, 2017 $0.23; Sep 26, 2017 $0.07; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0095; Jun 25, 2018 $0.26; Sep 25, 2018 $0.14; Dec 24, 2018 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.18; Sep 24, 2019 $0.21; Dec 23, 2019 $0.01; Jun 23, 2020 $0.21; Sep 22, 2020 $0.10; Dec 21, 2020 $0.05; Jun 24, 2021 $0.25; Sep 24, 2021 $0.14; Dec 27, 2021 $0.04; Mar 25, 2022 $0.16; Jun 24, 2022 $0.23; Sep 26, 2022 $0.11; Dec 23, 2022 $0.04; Jun 26, 2023 $0.25; Sep 25, 2023 $0.11; Dec 22, 2023 $0.13; Jun 25, 2024 $0.29; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 26, 2024 $0.09; Jun 25, 2025 $0.32; Sep 25, 2025 $0.14; Dec 26, 2025 $0.33; Mar 26, 2026 $0.02; Jun 25, 2026 $0.09; Sep 25, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CQQQ vs CXSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CQQQ
  • CXSE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CQQQ −61.4% · Feb 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CQQQ 32.3%CXSE 24.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CQQQ 0.14, betterCXSE 0.12
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CQQQ −61.4%CXSE −57.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CQQQ 1.01CXSE 0.75

CQQQ and CXSE in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CQQQCvsFLCHA

    Invesco China Technology ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CXSEAvsFLCHA

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQQQCvsMCHIA

    Invesco China Technology ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CXSEAvsMCHIA

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQQQCvsGXCA

    Invesco China Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CXSEAvsGXCA

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.