MCHI ranks 3rd and CQQQ 14th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CQQQ vs MCHI
MCHI −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
MCHI 2.1×the volume
1.08M2.24M
MCHI +2.0pt
+0.3%+2.3%
CQQQ vs MCHI Performance
−42.9%−20.6%
- CQQQ 0.65%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- CQQQ $1.74B
- MCHI $5.49B
- CQQQ −31.2%
- MCHI −21.3%, better
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- CQQQ 222
- MCHI 581
- CQQQ 1.08M sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- CQQQ $37.62
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CQQQ | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | D27 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A83 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F17 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CQQQ and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CQQQC
MCHIA
In short
CQQQ The tech sector, minus Silicon Valley. Trading since 2009, CQQQ tracks a FTSE index of Chinese technology companies, roughly 180 of them, instead of the US megacaps that fill almost every other tech fund.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
CQQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQQQ vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQQQ vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying CQQQ vs MCHI
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQQQ 0.65%
$12,717
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQQQ | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%CQQQ
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CQQQ vs MCHI Dividends
- CQQQ 2.98%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- CQQQ $1.13
- MCHI $1.10
- CQQQ $1.13
- MCHI $0.36
- CQQQ Dec 22, 2025
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- CQQQ Dec 26, 2025
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- CQQQ Annual
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
CQQQ vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CQQQ
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CQQQ 32.3%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CQQQ 0.14MCHI 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- CQQQ −61.4%MCHI −49.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CQQQ 1.01MCHI 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





