FRNW ranks 2nd and CTEC 12th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
CTEC vs FRNW
FRNW −0.11pt a year
0.50%0.39%
FRNW 33.6×the volume
2.15K72.2K
FRNW +7.9pt
−14.2%−6.3%
CTEC vs FRNW Performance
−53.5%−27.8%
- CTEC 0.50%
- FRNW 0.39%, better
- CTEC $21M
- FRNW $91M
- CTEC −17.2%
- FRNW −5.9%, better
- CTEC 0.71%
- FRNW 1.23%, better
- CTEC 44
- FRNW 66
- CTEC 2.15K sh
- FRNW 72.2K sh, better
- CTEC $50.22
- FRNW $19.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTEC | FRNW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | D27 | A83Higher |
| Durability | F19 | C48Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. CTEC and FRNW are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CTECC
FRNWA
In short
CTEC Climate tech, not just clean power. CTEC follows a global index of roughly 40 companies working on the technology side of decarbonization, and charges 0.50% a year to do it.
FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.
Stated mandate
CTEC The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Indxx Global ClimateTech Index before fees and expenses. It invests primarily in index constituents and related depositary receipts.
FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTEC vs FRNW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTEC vs FRNW Cost
Overpaying CTEC vs FRNW
$2,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTEC 0.50%
$9,979
FRNW 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTEC | FRNW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $705 | $195 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,725 | $735 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $7,898 | $2,081 |
- 0.50%CTEC
- 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
CTEC 5th cheapest of 16 funds
CTEC vs FRNW Dividends
- CTEC 0.71%
- FRNW 1.23%, better
- CTEC $0.35
- FRNW $0.24
- CTEC $0.07
- FRNW $0.05
- CTEC Jun 29, 2026
- FRNW Sep 18, 2026
- CTEC Jul 7, 2026
- FRNW Sep 22, 2026
- CTEC Twice a year
- FRNW Quarterly
Distribution history
CTEC vs FRNW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CTEC
- FRNW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTEC 37.3%FRNW 27.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CTEC 0.18FRNW 0.44, better
- Worst fall
- CTEC −76.5%FRNW −59.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CTEC 2.06FRNW 1.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.