Skip to content

CTJL vs PSCW

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

CTJLCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF

PSCWCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTJL −0.19pt a year

CTJL0.30%PSCW0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

CTJL 1.9×the volume

CTJL920PSCW482

CTJL vs PSCW Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+0.7%CTJL+1.5%PSCW

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. CTJL +0.7%. PSCW +1.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%2.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CTJL 0.30%, better
PSCW 0.49%
Fund size
CTJL $1M
PSCW $62M
1Y total return
CTJL No data
PSCW +11.4%
Holdings
CTJL 4
PSCW 3
Avg volume (30D)
CTJL 920 sh, better
PSCW 482 sh
NAV per share
CTJL $25.44
PSCW $30.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTJL: Cost 97, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. PSCW: Cost 81, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 27.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTJL, PSCW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTJLPSCW
Cost30% weightA97HigherA81
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51B57Higher
Tradability15% weightF12HigherF9
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF2D27Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTJL and PSCW are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

PSCW ranks 4th and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  2. Rank 4CPSCWPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 6CDJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 50
  4. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  5. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 17CCTJNCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTJLCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

PSCWCPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF

In short

CTJL No data

PSCW A 25% cushion against S&P 500 losses for 0.49%, well under the going rate in the deep-buffer aisle. Options do the work: index-like upside to a yearly cap, the first 25% of a decline absorbed, and the whole contract reset every April.

Stated mandate

CTJL No data

PSCW The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while providing a downside risk-mitigation buffer over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

CTJL No data

  • PSCW Costs 0.49% while the typical deep-buffer peer sits nearer 0.85% (DMAR is 0.85%, UFEB 0.79%). When your upside is capped, the fee you skip is upside you keep.
  • Deep by design: the buffer aims to absorb the first 25% of the referenced S&P 500 ETF's decline, before fees, over an approximate one-year period starting each April 1.paceretfs.com
  • One reference asset, one buffer, one cap, built with FLEX options. No factor tilt, no stock picking, nothing to second-guess about what is inside.paceretfs.com
  • Sibling funds (PSCX, PSCQ, PSCJ) run the same conservative strategy on different reset months, so an April start date is a choice rather than the only option.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

CTJL No data

  • PSCW Thinly traded next to the giants of the buffer world, so spreads can be wide and entry and exit deserve attention.
  • The cap is reset each April from whatever options pricing allows, and it is measured before fees. Buying mid-period means a different buffer and cap than the headline terms.paceretfs.com
  • Not an income vehicle: the structure has not paid a distribution over the past year, so results show up in the share price.

Full CTJL profile⁠

Full PSCW profile⁠

CTJL vs PSCW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTJL vs PSCW Cost

Overpaying PSCW vs CTJL

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTJL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • PSCW 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTJL 0.30%
  • PSCW 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSCW $9,792CTJL $6,149

Year by year

YearCTJLPSCWOverpaying
10$545$883$338
20$2,113$3,394$1,281
30$6,149$9,792$3,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
  • 0.49%PSCW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTJL cheapest of 19 funds

PSCW 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

CTJL vs PSCW Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTJL None
PSCW None

Distribution history

CTJLAll CTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSCWAll PSCW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTJL vs PSCW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCW 6.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCW 1.29
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTJL No dataPSCW −11.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTJL 0.00PSCW 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • CTJLCvsPSCXB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCWCvsPSCXB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTJLCvsUFEBB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCWCvsUFEBB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTJLCvsPSCQB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCWCvsPSCQB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.