USO ranks 4th and USL 5th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
USL vs USO
USO −0.15pt a year
1.01%0.86%
USO 531.5×the volume
10.8K5.73M
USL +6.3pt
+13.5%+7.2%
USL vs USO Performance
+122.2%+195.4%
- USL 1.01%
- USO 0.86%, better
- USL $52M
- USO $1.95B
- USL +85.0%
- USO +132.7%, better
- USL 16
- USO 17
- USL 10.8K sh
- USO 5.73M sh, better
- USL $65.01
- USO $170.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | USL | USO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | B65Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A70Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C47 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | D37 | A71Higher |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. USL and USO are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
USLC
USOB
In short
USL Oil exposure without the front-month cliff. USL spreads equal weight across 12 consecutive months of WTI futures, so each monthly roll touches only about a twelfth of the book. It has run that ladder since 2007.
USO The original US crude oil ETF, trading since 2006 and still one of the busiest ways to get WTI exposure without opening a futures account. It holds oil futures near the front of the curve, not barrels in a tank.
Stated mandate
USL USL seeks to track daily percentage changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, using specified short-term crude-oil futures contracts, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
USO USO seeks daily NAV percentage changes that reflect changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, measured by the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
USL vs USO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
USL vs USO Cost
Overpaying USL vs USO
$2,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
USL 1.01%
$18,850
USO 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | USL | USO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,525 | $255 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $5,768 | $918 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $16,368 | $2,482 |
- 1.01%USL
- 0.86%USO, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
USO 4th cheapest of 11 funds
USL 6th cheapest of 11 funds
USL vs USO Dividends
- USL None
- USO None
Distribution history
USL vs USO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- USL
- USO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- USL 26.1%, betterUSO 43.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- USL 0.62USO 0.71, better
- Worst fall
- USL −33.8%, betterUSO −36.2%
- Market sensitivity
- USL 1.36USO 2.22
USL and USO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





