DBO ranks 3rd and USL 5th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
DBO vs USL
0.0%by weight
DBO −0.20pt a year
0.81%1.01%
DBO 44.7×the volume
482K10.8K
DBO +0.6pt
+14.1%+13.5%
DBO vs USL Performance
+104.2%+122.2%
- DBO 0.81%, better
- USL 1.01%
- DBO $330M
- USL $52M
- DBO +111.8%, better
- USL +85.0%
- DBO 1.58%
- USL
- DBO 4
- USL 16
- DBO 482K sh, better
- USL 10.8K sh
- DBO $27.27
- USL $65.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DBO | USL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | C47 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | B66Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | D37 |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. DBO and USL are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DBOB
USLC
In short
DBO Oil exposure with a roll rule. DBO tracks a WTI crude futures index whose Optimum Yield design shops across contract months instead of camping in the front month, and it has run that way since 2007.
USL Oil exposure without the front-month cliff. USL spreads equal weight across 12 consecutive months of WTI futures, so each monthly roll touches only about a twelfth of the book. It has run that ladder since 2007.
Stated mandate
DBO The fund seeks to track positive or negative changes in the level of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return.
USL USL seeks to track daily percentage changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, using specified short-term crude-oil futures contracts, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DBO vs USL Holdings
How DBO and USL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DBO and 0.0% of USL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for USL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DBOMore in USL | DBO | USL |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- DBO226.8%
- USL81.9%
- DBO2
- USL3
Asset class
- DBO
- Alternatives
- USL
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in DBO2
- In both0
- Only in USL3
Only in DBO
2 securities, 100% of DBO by weight
- Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio92.82%
- Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF20.91%
Only in USL
3 securities, 39.9% of USL by weight
- Drey Inst Pref Gov Mm Inst 654627.17%
- Morgan Stanley Liq Govt Inst 830211.68%
- Treasury Bill 0 11/3/20261.08%
Weight gaps
DBO and USL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DBO vs USL Cost
Overpaying USL vs DBO
$3,332
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DBO 0.81%
$15,518
USL 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DBO | USL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,439 | $1,780 | $341 |
| 20 | $5,456 | $6,686 | $1,230 |
| 30 | $15,518 | $18,850 | $3,332 |
- 0.81%DBO, cheaper
- 1.01%USL
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
DBO 3rd cheapest of 11 funds
USL 6th cheapest of 11 funds
DBO vs USL Dividends
- DBO 1.58%
- USL
- DBO $0.43
- USL None
- DBO $0.43
- USL
- DBO Dec 22, 2025
- USL
- DBO Dec 26, 2025
- USL
- DBO Annual
- USL
Distribution history
DBO vs USL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DBO
- USL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DBO 33.8%USL 26.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DBO 0.63, betterUSL 0.62
- Worst fall
- DBO −37.7%USL −33.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DBO 1.77USL 1.36
DBO and USL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.81% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





