Skip to content
etf.net

DRUP vs XITK

GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF

DRUPBNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITKANYSE Arca

Overlap

10.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XITK −0.15pt a year

DRUP0.60%XITK0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

XITK 1.5×the volume

DRUP1.4KXITK2.15K

5Y return · a year

DRUP +13.5pt

DRUP+9.5%XITK−4.0%

DRUP vs XITK Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+57.2%DRUP−18.6%XITK

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. DRUP +57.2%. XITK −18.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%0%25%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DRUP 0.60%
XITK 0.45%, better
Fund size
DRUP $48M
XITK $67M
1Y total return
DRUP +0.6%, better
XITK −0.8%
Yield (12M)
DRUP 0.00%
XITK 0.00%
Holdings
DRUP 51
XITK 95
Avg volume (30D)
DRUP 1.4K sh
XITK 2.15K sh, better
NAV per share
DRUP $69.09
XITK $197.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DRUP: Cost 66, Risk 50, Mission 54, Tradability 46, Holdings 51, Durability 43. XITK: Cost 95, Risk 33, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 81, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for DRUP, XITK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDRUPXITK
Cost30% weightB66A95Higher
Mission25% weightC54Not scored
Risk15% weightC50HigherD33
Tradability15% weightC46B66Higher
Holdings10% weightC51A81Higher
Durability5% weightC43A73Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DRUP and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XITK ranks 4th and DRUP 12th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 4AXITKState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5AGINNGoldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 11BINVNAlger Russell Innovation ETFScore 57
  7. Rank 12BDRUPGraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETFScore 55
  8. Rank 12BTSNFTruth Social American Next Frontiers ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DRUPBGraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF

XITKAState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

In short

DRUP Disruption, measured. DRUP ranks large US companies on six fundamentals (patent value and research spend among them) and keeps about 50. Launched in 2019 as XOUT, the fund that dodged the disrupted, then switched to owning the disruptors.

XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.

Stated mandate

DRUP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index. It provides exposure to large-cap U.S.-listed companies selected for high disruption scores.

XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.

Why people hold it

  • DRUP A Nasdaq scoring model does the picking: six fundamental metrics, patent value included, ranked across the big-cap field, with the top scorers held.nasdaq.comgraniteshares.com
  • Large-cap only and reconstituted semiannually, so the innovation story shows up in companies with real revenue rather than pre-profit moonshots.nasdaq.com
  • Passive tracking of a published Nasdaq index, so the reason any holding is in there is checkable rather than a manager's hunch.nasdaq.com
  • Costs 0.60% a year with no temporary waiver propping that number up, which sits near the median for disruptive-innovation funds.
  • XITK Costs 0.45% a year, comfortably under the 0.65% median for disruptive-innovation funds, and it does it inside a plain index wrapper from a major ETF shop.
  • Equal weighting at each reset gives the hundredth holding the same slot as the first, so results lean on the whole basket rather than two or three mega-caps.factset.com
  • Screens segments, not slogans: only companies drawing most of their revenue from the fastest-growing corners of tech and electronic media make the cut.factset.comssga.com
  • Trading since 2016, giving it a live record across several tech cycles, and it sits in the upper tier of our innovation-fund cohort review.

Worth knowing

  • DRUP Cheaper disruption exposure exists: KOMP charges 0.20%, also with no waiver.
  • The record before August 15, 2023 belongs to a different strategy; the fund tracked the XOUT US Large Cap Index until that index swap.sec.govgraniteshares.com
  • Thinly traded, and roughly 50 innovators makes for concentrated, tech-flavored swings. Filings note the fund can become non-diversified.graniteshares.com
  • XITK Growth-screened tech, equal-weighted, means smaller names carry a giant's weight. Expect a rougher ride than a cap-weighted tech fund.
  • Thinly traded for its category and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the household-name tech ETFs.
  • Cheaper shelfmates exist: KOMP runs a broad new-economy basket for 0.20%.

Full DRUP profile⁠

Full XITK profile⁠

DRUP vs XITK Holdings

How DRUP and XITK differ

Overlap by weight

10.0%

Shared holdings make up 24.0% of DRUP and 10.7% of XITK.

Level by level

  • Holdings10 in both10.0%
  • Sector7 Sectors73.2%
  • Countryby domicile95.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in DRUP and XITK, widest gap first
SectorMore in DRUPMore in XITK
TechnologyXITK +25.5 points
Health CareDRUP +23.6 points
CommunicationDRUP +3.0 points
FinancialsXITK +0.8 points
IndustrialsXITK +0.4 points
Real EstateDRUP +0.2 points
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DRUP and XITK, widest gap first
CountryMore in DRUPMore in XITK
United StatesDRUP +3.8 points
ChinaXITK +3.6 points
SwitzerlandDRUP +1.2 points
TaiwanXITK +0.8 points
IsraelXITK +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DRUP49.4%
  • XITK22.1%

Securities held

  • DRUP51
  • XITK94

Asset class

DRUP
Equity
XITK
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DRUP41
  • In both10
  • Only in XITK84

Only in DRUP

41 securities, 76.0% of DRUP by weight

  • Microsoft Corp10.48%
  • Eli Lilly & Co6.50%
  • Johnson & Johnson4.45%

Only in XITK

84 securities, 89.2% of XITK by weight

  • Axt Inc4.00%
  • Advanced Micro Devices2.62%
  • Silicon Motion Technol Adr2.53%

Weight gaps

All 10 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in DRUP and XITK, widest gap first
HoldingMore in DRUPMore in XITK
Meta Platforms IncMETADRUP +5.51 points
Alphabet Inc-Cl AGOOGLDRUP +5.28 points
Palantir TechnologiePLTRDRUP +2.48 points
Snowflake Inc-Class ASNOWDRUP +0.33 points
Datadog IncDDOGXITK +0.31 points
Ptc IncPTCXITK +0.25 points
Costar Group IncCSGPDRUP +0.18 points
Workday IncWDAYDRUP +0.14 points

All 51 DRUP holdings⁠All 94 XITK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DRUP vs XITK Cost

Overpaying DRUP vs XITK

$2,776

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DRUP 0.60%

    $11,817

  • XITK 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DRUP 0.60%
  • XITK 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530DRUP $11,817XITK $9,041

Year by year

YearDRUPXITKOverpaying
10$1,076$812$264
20$4,116$3,128$988
30$11,817$9,041$2,776

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%DRUP
  • 0.45%XITK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds

DRUP 11th cheapest of 30 funds

DRUP vs XITK Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
DRUP 0.00%
XITK 0.00%
Payout (12M)
DRUP None
XITK None

Distribution history

Per share, 2016 to 2023, same scale for both

DRUP16 paymentsAll DRUP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2016 to 2023. Dec 30, 2019 $0.05; Mar 18, 2020 $0.06; Jun 17, 2020 $0.05; Sep 16, 2020 $0.04; Dec 30, 2020 $0.05; Mar 17, 2021 $0.04; Jun 16, 2021 $0.03; Sep 15, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.04; Mar 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 28, 2022 $0.04; Sep 28, 2022 $0.05; Dec 28, 2022 $0.04; Mar 29, 2023 $0.06; Jun 28, 2023 $0.08; Dec 27, 2023 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1201720202023
XITK11 paymentsAll XITK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2016 to 2023. Sep 16, 2016 $0.03; Dec 16, 2016 $1.06; Dec 15, 2017 $1.36; Dec 24, 2018 $1.24; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.13; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.05; Jun 20, 2023 $0.0071; Sep 18, 2023 $0.0094; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1201720202023

DRUP vs XITK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DRUP
  • XITK
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: XITK −61.4% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DRUP 19.7%, betterXITK 25.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DRUP 0.90, betterXITK 0.63
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DRUP −31.3%, betterXITK −61.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DRUP 1.14XITK 1.67

Popular comparisons

  • DRUPBvsXTA

    GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DRUPBvsKOMPA

    GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsKOMPA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DRUPBvsTRFMA

    GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.