Skip to content

EART vs ION

Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

EARTBNasdaq

ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF

IONCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ION −0.01pt a year

EART0.59%ION0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

EART 9.4×the volume

EART17.1KION1.83K

EART vs ION Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−12.9%EART−20.4%ION

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. EART −12.9%. ION −20.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EART 0.59%
ION 0.58%, better
Fund size
EART $41M
ION $9M
1Y total return
EART No data
ION −9.8%
Yield (12M)
EART 0.79%
ION 2.20%, better
Holdings
EART 55
ION 53
Avg volume (30D)
EART 17.1K sh, better
ION 1.83K sh
NAV per share
EART $24.00
ION $38.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EART: Cost 69, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 72, Durability 70. ION: Cost 69, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 16, Holdings not scored, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for EART, ION, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEARTION
Cost30% weightB69B69
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45B63Higher
Tradability15% weightC45HigherF16
Holdings10% weightA72Not scored
Durability5% weightA70HigherC46

Rank among Critical Materials funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EART and ION are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Critical Materials⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

EART ranks 3rd and ION 5th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.

  1. Rank 1AREMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETFScore 64
  3. Rank 3BEARTGlobal X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 4CSETMSprott Critical Materials ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5CFMTLFirst Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 5CIONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETFScore 53
  7. Rank 7CEMETVanEck Copper and Green Metals ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EARTBGlobal X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

IONCProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF

In short

EART Rare earths are the headline, but the basket runs wider: ten critical-material categories, from copper and lithium to cobalt and carbon fiber, screened so miners must earn at least half their revenue from the stuff.

ION Most battery funds hand you carmakers and cell assemblers. ION stays upstream: only the miners pulling lithium, nickel and cobalt out of the ground, weighted by how much of their revenue actually comes from those three metals.

Stated mandate

EART The fund seeks exposure to companies producing rare-earth components, metals, and other raw or composite materials needed for expanding critical technologies, including electric vehicles, energy storage, robotics, and radar systems.

ION ION invests globally in companies producing battery metals used in next-generation technologies. Its mandate focuses on lithium, nickel, and cobalt mining companies and the battery-driven demand supporting those metals.

Why people hold it

  • EART Costs 0.59% a year, below the typical fee in its critical-materials peer group.
  • Purity rule with teeth: a company needs 50% of revenue from the ten materials, so conglomerates with a lithium side hustle stay out.globalxetfs.com
  • Caps each name at 4% and floors it at 0.3%, reset twice a year, so one giant miner cannot swallow a roughly 50-stock portfolio.globalxetfs.com
  • Global mandate covering miners and processors wherever they list, and one of the stronger builds in its critical-materials peer group.
  • ION Launched in 2022 as the first ETF built to hold only battery-metals miners. No EV brands or battery assemblers riding along in the basket.proshares.com
  • The index ranks companies by the share of revenue they earn producing cobalt, lithium and nickel, so the purest miners carry the heaviest weights.spglobal.com
  • A 0.58% expense ratio sits below the typical fee in the critical-materials aisle, and the fund distributes quarterly.proshares.com
  • Global net: the eligible pool is S&P's worldwide market index, so miners listed outside the US compete for slots on equal footing.spglobal.com

Worth knowing

  • EART Rare earths share the basket with copper, lithium, nickel and platinum group metals, so broad commodity cycles move it as much as any rare-earth squeeze.globalxetfs.com
  • A small fund with light volume next to the category's giants, which can mean wider spreads, especially near the open and close.
  • Listed in 2022 as the Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and renamed in 2026, so the track record predates the rare-earth branding.globalxetfs.com
  • ION Roughly 50 miners levered to three commodity prices. Purity cuts both ways: when lithium, nickel and cobalt move, there is little else in here to cushion it.proshares.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Spreads can run wider than in the aisle's household names, which matters most on larger orders.
  • Broader miner funds such as PICK spread across metals and mining generally and charge less. ION is the narrower, more concentrated cut of the theme.

Full EART profile⁠

Full ION profile⁠

EART vs ION Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EART vs ION Cost

Overpaying EART vs ION

$182

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EART 0.59%

    $11,635

  • ION 0.58%

    $11,453

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EART 0.59%
  • ION 0.58%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530EART $11,635ION $11,453

Year by year

YearEARTIONOverpaying
10$1,058$1,041$17
20$4,051$3,986$65
30$11,635$11,453$182

Expense ratio

  • 0.59%EART
  • 0.58%ION, cheaper
  • Middle half of Critical Materials funds
  • Median 0.64%

ION 4th cheapest of 12 funds

EART 5th cheapest of 12 funds

EART vs ION Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EART 0.79%
ION 2.20%, better
Payout (12M)
EART $0.19
ION $0.82
Last payment
EART $0.14
ION $0.28
Ex-dividend
EART Jun 29, 2026
ION Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
EART Jul 7, 2026
ION Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
EART Twice a year
ION Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

EARTTwice a year · 9 paymentsAll EART payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2022 $0.25; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.16; Dec 28, 2023 $0.12; Jun 27, 2024 $0.05; Dec 30, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2025 $0.13; Dec 30, 2025 $0.05; Jun 29, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
IONQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll ION payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2022 $0.05; Jun 21, 2023 $0.25; Sep 20, 2023 $0.31; Dec 20, 2023 $0.15; Mar 20, 2024 $0.03; Jun 26, 2024 $0.19; Sep 25, 2024 $0.16; Dec 23, 2024 $0.07; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.27; Sep 24, 2025 $0.22; Dec 24, 2025 $0.34; Jun 24, 2026 $0.21; Sep 23, 2026 $0.28. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

EART vs ION Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EART No dataION 33.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EART No dataION 0.34
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EART No dataION −52.1%since Dec 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EART 1.29ION 1.30

EART and ION in the news

Popular comparisons

  • EARTBvsREMXA

    Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IONCvsREMXA

    ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EARTBvsILITB

    Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IONCvsILITB

    ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EARTBvsSETMC

    Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IONCvsSETMC

    ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.