QLVE ranks 7th and ECON 16th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
ECON vs QLVE
QLVE −0.31pt a year
0.49%0.18%
ECON 61.1×the volume
24.7K404
QLVE +0.7pt
+6.3%+7.0%
ECON vs QLVE Performance
+35.9%+40.2%
- ECON 0.49%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- ECON $294M
- QLVE $16M
- ECON +18.2%, better
- QLVE +11.2%
- ECON 1.50%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- ECON 366
- QLVE 155
- ECON 24.7K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- ECON $32.72
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECON | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | C44 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D32Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | B56Higher | D32 |
| Durability | C51Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. ECON and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECOND
QLVEB
In short
ECON A 2010-vintage emerging markets ticker with a second act: once a consumer-stocks portfolio, now a broad EM index fund that screens out the names Columbia's quant models rate poorly on quality, value and catalyst.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
ECON The Fund is an index-based emerging-economies equity ETF seeking to track the performance of the Beta Advantage® Research Enhanced Solactive Emerging Economies Index.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECON vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECON vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying ECON vs QLVE
$6,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECON 0.49%
$9,792
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECON | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $328 | $555 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,281 | $2,113 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $3,749 | $6,043 |
- 0.49%ECON
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
ECON 14th cheapest of 20 funds
ECON vs QLVE Dividends
- ECON 1.50%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- ECON $0.48
- QLVE $1.02
- ECON $0.48
- QLVE $0.34
- ECON Dec 18, 2025
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- ECON Dec 26, 2025
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- ECON Annual
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
ECON vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ECON
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECON 17.5%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ECON 0.87QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- ECON −33.8%QLVE −23.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ECON 1.12QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.