EDEN vs FLKR

EDENDiShares MSCI Denmark ETF

FLKRBFranklin FTSE South Korea ETF

In short

EDEN One ticker, one small country. EDEN tracks a capped index of Danish stocks, so a short list of Copenhagen names carries the load. Running since 2012, it is the narrow way to own Denmark instead of all of Europe.

FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.

Stated mandate

EDEN The fund seeks to track an index composed of Danish equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Denmark.

FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.

Why people hold it

• EDEN Pure Denmark, undiluted: the mandate is an index of Danish equities, not a Nordic or pan-European blend, so the country you picked is the country you get.
• The 25/50 capping built into its index limits how heavy any one issuer can become, a useful guardrail in a market where a few giants tower over the rest.
• An IMI index and roughly 40 stocks means large, mid and small caps in one line item, not only the blue-chip headliners.
• Listed since 2012 under the iShares banner, so there is more than a decade of operating history behind the ticker.

• FLKR Charges 0.09% a year against a 0.50% median for single-country developed-market ETFs, tying FLAU as the cheapest fee among this cohort's leaders and undercutting EWC and EWU by a wide margin.
• Straight indexing: it seeks returns that closely correspond, before fees, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index. No manager views, no discretionary tilts.
• The capped index spreads roughly 160 stocks and limits how far any single giant can dominate the basket, which matters in a market this top-heavy.
• A billion-dollar-plus fund that trades actively, and it has been running since 2017, so it is well past the launch-window stage.

Worth knowing

• EDEN The 0.53% annual fee sits above the middle of the single-country developed pack, where rivals like FLKR and FLAU run at 0.09%.
• Thinly traded and modest in size, so spreads can widen and fills get lumpier than in a mega-fund. Trade size and timing matter more here.
• One small market, roughly 40 names: single-stock and sector moves land harder than in a broad international fund. On cost, trading and risk measures it sits in the lower reaches of its peer group.

• FLKR One country, one currency. Korean shares price in won, so the exchange rate is baked into what a US investor sees, separate from how the companies do.
• Roughly 160 stocks in a single export-driven market is a narrow slice next to a global fund. Capping softens concentration, it does not erase it.
• Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, so it is built as an equity holding rather than an income schedule.

Full EDEN profile⁠

Full FLKR profile⁠