Skip to content

EMMF vs QLVE

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund

EMMFDNYSE Arca

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

QLVEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLVE −0.30pt a year

EMMF0.48%QLVE0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

EMMF 33.7×the volume

EMMF13.6KQLVE404

5Y return · a year

EMMF +1.6pt

EMMF+8.6%QLVE+7.0%

EMMF vs QLVE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+51.1%EMMF+40.2%QLVE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. EMMF +51.1%. QLVE +40.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%80%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EMMF 0.48%
QLVE 0.18%, better
Fund size
EMMF $180M
QLVE $16M
1Y total return
EMMF +11.4%, better
QLVE +11.2%
Yield (12M)
EMMF 1.45%
QLVE 3.17%, better
Holdings
EMMF 225
QLVE 155
Avg volume (30D)
EMMF 13.6K sh, better
QLVE 404 sh
NAV per share
EMMF $34.68
QLVE $32.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMMF: Cost 37, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 20, Holdings 53, Durability 41. QLVE: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 93, Tradability 11, Holdings 32, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMMF, QLVE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMMFQLVE
Cost30% weightD37A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightC48B66Higher
Tradability15% weightF20HigherF11
Holdings10% weightC53HigherD32
Durability5% weightC41HigherD33

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMMF and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

QLVE ranks 7th and EMMF 15th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 6BJPEMJPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 7BQLVENorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 8BROAMHartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 14CMFEMPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 15DEMMFWisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor FundScore 38
  6. Rank 16DECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EMMFDWisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund

QLVEBNorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

In short

EMMF EMMF scores emerging-markets stocks on value, quality and momentum together, then holds the winners in one roughly 240-name portfolio. A single-ticket factor blend from WisdomTree, live since 2018, priced at the middle of its peer group.

QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

EMMF The fund seeks capital appreciation through primarily investing in emerging-markets equity securities selected using composite multifactor scores.

QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.

Why people hold it

  • EMMF Three factors in one wrapper: value, quality and momentum scored into a single composite, instead of bolting separate EM sleeves together.wisdomtree.com
  • The 0.48% expense ratio lands exactly at the median for emerging-markets multifactor funds. No premium for the factor machinery.
  • Spreads across roughly 240 emerging-markets names and pays quarterly, so no single country or company story dominates the sleeve.
  • Trading since 2018, which means a real-money record through several full emerging-markets cycles rather than a backtest.
  • QLVE At 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027, it undercuts every top-scoring fund in its peer group, including EMGF at 0.26% and FDEM at 0.25%.
  • The index cuts the lowest-quality fifth of emerging-markets large and mid caps on profitability, cash flow and capital deployment, then optimizes the rest for lower volatility.flexshares.comnortherntrust.com
  • Sector, industry and country weights are held within set bands of the parent benchmark and turnover is capped near 12% a rebalance, curbing the sector drift low-vol screens invite.northerntrust.comsec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its emerging-markets factor peer group and has stayed close to its stated index.

Worth knowing

  • EMMF Thinly traded and small next to the giants of the category, so bid-ask spreads and trade timing carry more weight here.
  • Cheaper factor rivals sit on the same shelf: EMGF at 0.26% and AVES at 0.36% run the same EM factor idea for less.
  • Our review puts it in the lower half of its emerging-markets multifactor group, mostly on cost-versus-peers, tradability and portfolio construction.
  • QLVE Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads can run wider than the category heavyweights and limit orders matter more.
  • Roughly 160 holdings with meaningful weight in the largest names, so it is more top-heavy than a broad emerging-markets index fund.
  • Lower volatility is the design goal, not an outcome the fund controls: the index aims to be calmer than its parent, and the fund tracks it either way.sec.govflexshares.com

Full EMMF profile⁠

Full QLVE profile⁠

EMMF vs QLVE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMMF vs QLVE Cost

Overpaying EMMF vs QLVE

$5,856

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMMF 0.48%

    $9,605

  • QLVE 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMMF 0.48%
  • QLVE 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530EMMF $9,605QLVE $3,749

Year by year

YearEMMFQLVEOverpaying
10$865$328$537
20$3,328$1,281$2,047
30$9,605$3,749$5,856

Expense ratio

  • 0.48%EMMF
  • 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QLVE cheapest of 20 funds

EMMF 13th cheapest of 20 funds

EMMF vs QLVE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EMMF 1.45%
QLVE 3.17%, better
Payout (12M)
EMMF $0.50
QLVE $1.02
Last payment
EMMF $0.15
QLVE $0.34
Ex-dividend
EMMF Sep 25, 2026
QLVE Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
EMMF Sep 29, 2026
QLVE Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
EMMF Quarterly
QLVE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

EMMFQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll EMMF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2018 $0.03; Dec 24, 2018 $0.12; Mar 26, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.16; Sep 24, 2019 $0.33; Dec 23, 2019 $0.14; Mar 24, 2020 $0.06; Jun 23, 2020 $0.10; Sep 22, 2020 $0.21; Dec 21, 2020 $0.09; Jun 24, 2021 $0.23; Sep 24, 2021 $0.40; Dec 27, 2021 $0.04; Mar 25, 2022 $0.06; Jun 24, 2022 $0.18; Sep 26, 2022 $0.33; Dec 23, 2022 $0.16; Mar 27, 2023 $0.04; Jun 26, 2023 $0.15; Sep 25, 2023 $0.10; Dec 22, 2023 $0.11; Mar 22, 2024 $0.05; Jun 25, 2024 $0.12; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 26, 2024 $0.10; Mar 26, 2025 $0.11; Jun 25, 2025 $0.23; Sep 25, 2025 $0.18; Dec 31, 2025 $0.04; Mar 26, 2026 $0.08; Jun 25, 2026 $0.23; Sep 25, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
QLVEQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll QLVE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2019 $0.11; Dec 20, 2019 $0.23; Mar 20, 2020 $0.0066; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.24; Dec 18, 2020 $0.03; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.24; Dec 17, 2021 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.06; Jun 16, 2023 $0.15; Sep 15, 2023 $0.40; Dec 15, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2024 $0.16; Sep 20, 2024 $0.09; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Mar 21, 2025 $0.09; Jun 20, 2025 $0.20; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.43; Dec 24, 2025 $0.0056; Jun 18, 2026 $0.24; Sep 18, 2026 $0.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

EMMF vs QLVE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • EMMF
  • QLVE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QLVE −23.6% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMMF 14.7%QLVE 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMMF 0.87QLVE 1.11, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMMF −22.9%, betterQLVE −23.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMMF 0.89QLVE 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • EMMFDvsEMGFA

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsEMGFA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMMFDvsAVESA

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsAVESA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMMFDvsFDEMA

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsFDEMA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.