QLVE ranks 7th and EMMF 15th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMMF vs QLVE
QLVE −0.30pt a year
0.48%0.18%
EMMF 33.7×the volume
13.6K404
EMMF +1.6pt
+8.6%+7.0%
EMMF vs QLVE Performance
+51.1%+40.2%
- EMMF 0.48%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- EMMF $180M
- QLVE $16M
- EMMF +11.4%, better
- QLVE +11.2%
- EMMF 1.45%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- EMMF 225
- QLVE 155
- EMMF 13.6K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- EMMF $34.68
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMMF | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | C48 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | F20Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | D32 |
| Durability | C41Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMMF and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMMFD
QLVEB
In short
EMMF EMMF scores emerging-markets stocks on value, quality and momentum together, then holds the winners in one roughly 240-name portfolio. A single-ticket factor blend from WisdomTree, live since 2018, priced at the middle of its peer group.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
EMMF The fund seeks capital appreciation through primarily investing in emerging-markets equity securities selected using composite multifactor scores.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMMF vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMMF vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying EMMF vs QLVE
$5,856
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMMF 0.48%
$9,605
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMMF | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $865 | $328 | $537 |
| 20 | $3,328 | $1,281 | $2,047 |
| 30 | $9,605 | $3,749 | $5,856 |
- 0.48%EMMF
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
EMMF 13th cheapest of 20 funds
EMMF vs QLVE Dividends
- EMMF 1.45%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- EMMF $0.50
- QLVE $1.02
- EMMF $0.15
- QLVE $0.34
- EMMF Sep 25, 2026
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- EMMF Sep 29, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- EMMF Quarterly
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
EMMF vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMMF
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMMF 14.7%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMMF 0.87QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- EMMF −22.9%, betterQLVE −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- EMMF 0.89QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.48% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.