Skip to content

ENDW vs LGH

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

LGHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.80pt a year

ENDW0.22%LGH1.02%

Avg volume · 30D

LGH 1.3×the volume

ENDW17.1KLGH23K

ENDW vs LGH Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW+3.7%LGH

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. LGH +3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
LGH 1.02%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
LGH $578M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
LGH +3.7%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
LGH 0.37%
Holdings
ENDW 73
LGH 418
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh
LGH 23K sh, better
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
LGH $64.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. LGH: Cost 33, Risk 35, Mission 75, Tradability 95, Holdings 83, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, LGH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWLGH
Cost30% weightA100HigherD33
Mission25% weightA81HigherA75
Risk15% weightA75HigherD35
Tradability15% weightB69A95Higher
Holdings10% weightB62A83Higher
Durability5% weightB65A89Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and LGH are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and LGH 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 12BLGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 12BMOODRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

LGHBHCM Defender 500 Index ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

LGH A 500-stock US large-cap index with an eject button. HCM's own trend model can cut equity exposure to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, then waits for the market to close back above the line before buying in again. Fee: 1.00% a year.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

LGH The Fund seeks to track the HCM Defender 500 Index before fees and expenses. Its index generally uses large-capitalization U.S. equities but can reduce exposure through 70/30, 40/60, or all-cash positions as market conditions change.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • LGH The exit ramp is the product. A trend signal, not a manager's gut, decides when the index steps down from full equity to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, and re-entry requires five straight closes back above the line.howardcm.com
  • Self-indexed and founder-run: Howard Capital Management sponsors, builds and maintains the index itself, and the firm's founder has been the portfolio manager since the fund began operations in 2019.howardcm.com
  • One of the better-built options in a crowded tactical-allocation field of dozens of funds, with years of live record behind the signal rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • LGH 1.00% a year sits above the category median fee, and well above peers like ENDW at 0.22% or PBL at 0.45%. That is active-manager pricing for a rules-based overlay.
  • Trend models move late by design. The index only de-risks after the market has already fallen below the line, and only re-risks after five confirming closes, so it can hold cash while stocks are climbing.howardcm.com
  • Equity exposure can come indirectly, through derivatives, other funds and leveraged ETFs, which adds plumbing most plain index funds do not carry.sec.govhowardcm.com

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full LGH profile⁠

ENDW vs LGH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs LGH Cost

Overpaying LGH vs ENDW

$14,454

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • LGH 1.02%

    $19,012

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • LGH 1.02%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LGH $19,012ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWLGHOverpaying
10$401$1,797$1,396
20$1,561$6,746$5,185
30$4,558$19,012$14,454

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 1.02%LGH
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

LGH 31st cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs LGH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
LGH 0.37%
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
LGH $0.24
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
LGH $0.24
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
LGH Dec 16, 2025
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
LGH Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
LGH Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
LGHAnnual · 8 paymentsAll LGH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 13, 2019 $0.05; Dec 14, 2020 $0.08; Dec 15, 2021 $0.06; Dec 29, 2021 $0.0037; Dec 15, 2022 $0.20; Dec 15, 2023 $0.26; Dec 16, 2024 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

ENDW vs LGH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025LGH 14.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025LGH 1.13
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025LGH −29.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61LGH 1.17

ENDW and LGH in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsGMODA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsPTBDA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsRISNA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.