GMOD ranks 2nd and LGH 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs LGH
GMOD −0.52pt a year
0.50%1.02%
LGH 1.9×the volume
11.8K23K
GMOD vs LGH Performance
+11.8%+3.7%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- LGH 1.02%
- GMOD $49M
- LGH $578M
- GMOD +11.8%, better
- LGH +3.7%
- GMOD
- LGH 0.37%
- GMOD 20
- LGH 418
- GMOD 11.8K sh
- LGH 23K sh, better
- GMOD $27.77
- LGH $64.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | LGH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | D33 |
| Mission | A74 | A75Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A73 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A83Higher |
| Durability | C49 | A89Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and LGH are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
LGHB
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
LGH A 500-stock US large-cap index with an eject button. HCM's own trend model can cut equity exposure to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, then waits for the market to close back above the line before buying in again. Fee: 1.00% a year.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
LGH The Fund seeks to track the HCM Defender 500 Index before fees and expenses. Its index generally uses large-capitalization U.S. equities but can reduce exposure through 70/30, 40/60, or all-cash positions as market conditions change.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs LGH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs LGH Cost
Overpaying LGH vs GMOD
$9,033
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
LGH 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | LGH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,797 | $897 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,746 | $3,286 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $19,012 | $9,033 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 1.02%LGH
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
LGH 31st cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs LGH Dividends
- GMOD
- LGH 0.37%
- GMOD
- LGH $0.24
- GMOD $0.14
- LGH $0.24
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- LGH Dec 16, 2025
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- LGH Dec 22, 2025
- GMOD Twice a year
- LGH Annual
Distribution history
GMOD vs LGH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%LGH 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89LGH 1.13
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%LGH −29.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48LGH 1.17
GMOD and LGH in the news

Category Review
Tactical funds ranged from a 32.2% gain to a 12.5% loss

Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.