Skip to content

GMOD vs LGH

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

LGHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.52pt a year

GMOD0.50%LGH1.02%

Avg volume · 30D

LGH 1.9×the volume

GMOD11.8KLGH23K

GMOD vs LGH Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+3.7%LGH

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. LGH +3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
LGH 1.02%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
LGH $578M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
LGH +3.7%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
LGH 0.37%
Holdings
GMOD 20
LGH 418
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh
LGH 23K sh, better
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
LGH $64.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. LGH: Cost 33, Risk 35, Mission 75, Tradability 95, Holdings 83, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, LGH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODLGH
Cost30% weightA90HigherD33
Mission25% weightA74A75Higher
Risk15% weightA75HigherD35
Tradability15% weightA73A95Higher
Holdings10% weightB64A83Higher
Durability5% weightC49A89Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and LGH are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and LGH 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 12BLGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 12BMOODRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

LGHBHCM Defender 500 Index ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

LGH A 500-stock US large-cap index with an eject button. HCM's own trend model can cut equity exposure to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, then waits for the market to close back above the line before buying in again. Fee: 1.00% a year.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

LGH The Fund seeks to track the HCM Defender 500 Index before fees and expenses. Its index generally uses large-capitalization U.S. equities but can reduce exposure through 70/30, 40/60, or all-cash positions as market conditions change.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • LGH The exit ramp is the product. A trend signal, not a manager's gut, decides when the index steps down from full equity to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, and re-entry requires five straight closes back above the line.howardcm.com
  • Self-indexed and founder-run: Howard Capital Management sponsors, builds and maintains the index itself, and the firm's founder has been the portfolio manager since the fund began operations in 2019.howardcm.com
  • One of the better-built options in a crowded tactical-allocation field of dozens of funds, with years of live record behind the signal rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • LGH 1.00% a year sits above the category median fee, and well above peers like ENDW at 0.22% or PBL at 0.45%. That is active-manager pricing for a rules-based overlay.
  • Trend models move late by design. The index only de-risks after the market has already fallen below the line, and only re-risks after five confirming closes, so it can hold cash while stocks are climbing.howardcm.com
  • Equity exposure can come indirectly, through derivatives, other funds and leveraged ETFs, which adds plumbing most plain index funds do not carry.sec.govhowardcm.com

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full LGH profile⁠

GMOD vs LGH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs LGH Cost

Overpaying LGH vs GMOD

$9,033

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • LGH 1.02%

    $19,012

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • LGH 1.02%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LGH $19,012GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODLGHOverpaying
10$900$1,797$897
20$3,460$6,746$3,286
30$9,979$19,012$9,033

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 1.02%LGH
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

LGH 31st cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs LGH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
LGH 0.37%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
LGH $0.24
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
LGH $0.24
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
LGH Dec 16, 2025
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
LGH Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
LGH Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
LGHAnnual · 8 paymentsAll LGH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 13, 2019 $0.05; Dec 14, 2020 $0.08; Dec 15, 2021 $0.06; Dec 29, 2021 $0.0037; Dec 15, 2022 $0.20; Dec 15, 2023 $0.26; Dec 16, 2024 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

GMOD vs LGH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025LGH 14.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025LGH 1.13
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025LGH −29.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48LGH 1.17

GMOD and LGH in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsENDWA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsPTBDA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsRISNA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.