Skip to content

LGH vs PTBD

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

LGHBNYSE Arca

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.42pt a year

LGH1.02%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

LGH 1.2×the volume

LGH23KPTBD18.6K

5Y return · a year

LGH +10.0pt

LGH+8.4%PTBD−1.6%

LGH vs PTBD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+49.7%LGH−7.9%PTBD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. LGH +49.7%. PTBD −7.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%20%40%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LGH 1.02%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
LGH $578M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
LGH +3.7%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
LGH 0.37%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
LGH 418
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
LGH 23K sh, better
PTBD 18.6K sh
NAV per share
LGH $64.59
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LGH: Cost 33, Risk 35, Mission 75, Tradability 95, Holdings 83, Durability 89. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for LGH, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLGHPTBD
Cost30% weightD33A83Higher
Mission25% weightA75Not scored
Risk15% weightD35B60Higher
Tradability15% weightA95HigherC50
Holdings10% weightA83A90Higher
Durability5% weightA89HigherA83

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LGH and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and LGH 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 12BLGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETFScore 60
  7. Rank 12BMOODRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LGHBHCM Defender 500 Index ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

LGH A 500-stock US large-cap index with an eject button. HCM's own trend model can cut equity exposure to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, then waits for the market to close back above the line before buying in again. Fee: 1.00% a year.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

LGH The Fund seeks to track the HCM Defender 500 Index before fees and expenses. Its index generally uses large-capitalization U.S. equities but can reduce exposure through 70/30, 40/60, or all-cash positions as market conditions change.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • LGH The exit ramp is the product. A trend signal, not a manager's gut, decides when the index steps down from full equity to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, and re-entry requires five straight closes back above the line.howardcm.com
  • Self-indexed and founder-run: Howard Capital Management sponsors, builds and maintains the index itself, and the firm's founder has been the portfolio manager since the fund began operations in 2019.howardcm.com
  • One of the better-built options in a crowded tactical-allocation field of dozens of funds, with years of live record behind the signal rather than a backtest.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • LGH 1.00% a year sits above the category median fee, and well above peers like ENDW at 0.22% or PBL at 0.45%. That is active-manager pricing for a rules-based overlay.
  • Trend models move late by design. The index only de-risks after the market has already fallen below the line, and only re-risks after five confirming closes, so it can hold cash while stocks are climbing.howardcm.com
  • Equity exposure can come indirectly, through derivatives, other funds and leveraged ETFs, which adds plumbing most plain index funds do not carry.sec.govhowardcm.com
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full LGH profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

LGH vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LGH vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying LGH vs PTBD

$7,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LGH 1.02%

    $19,012

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LGH 1.02%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LGH $19,012PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearLGHPTBDOverpaying
10$1,797$1,076$721
20$6,746$4,116$2,630
30$19,012$11,817$7,195

Expense ratio

  • 1.02%LGH
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

LGH 31st cheapest of 46 funds

LGH vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LGH 0.37%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
LGH $0.24
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
LGH $0.24
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
LGH Dec 16, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
LGH Dec 22, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
LGH Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LGHAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LGH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2023 $0.26; Dec 16, 2024 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

LGH vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LGH
  • PTBD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: LGH −29.4% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LGH 14.9%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LGH 1.13, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LGH −29.4%PTBD −24.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LGH 1.17PTBD 0.74

LGH and PTBD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LGHBvsENDWA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsGMODA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsRISNA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.