Skip to content

ENDW vs MATR

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

MATRBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.58pt a year

ENDW0.22%MATR0.80%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 23.8×the volume

ENDW17.1KMATR721

ENDW vs MATR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW+4.1%MATR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. MATR +4.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
MATR 0.80%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
MATR $10M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
MATR +4.1%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
MATR 2.88%, better
Holdings
ENDW 73
MATR 27
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
MATR 721 sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
MATR $26.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. MATR: Cost 69, Risk 55, Mission 80, Tradability 40, Holdings 69, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, MATR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWMATR
Cost30% weightA100HigherB69
Mission25% weightA81HigherA80
Risk15% weightA75HigherB55
Tradability15% weightB69HigherC40
Holdings10% weightB62B69Higher
Durability5% weightB65HigherD35

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and MATR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and MATR 9th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

MATRBHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

MATR Harbor's in-house macro team reads the business cycle, then sets the mix of stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs to match it. A tactical allocation fund for investors who want the regime call outsourced, priced near the middle of its category.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

MATR The Fund seeks long-term total return while limiting downside risk. Its allocation is driven by regime modeling across multiple asset categories, including real estate investment trusts and commodities.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • MATR Growth, liquidity and inflation signals define the current business-cycle regime, and each regime maps to a distinct blend of equity, fixed income, commodity and currency funds.harborcapital.com
  • Run in-house by Harbor's Multi-Asset Solutions Team, with a bottom-up research layer on top of the systematic model rather than a pure black box.harborcapital.com
  • The prospectus pairs long-term total return with limiting downside risk, and reaches into corners a plain 60/40 skips: REITs, commodities, high yield, emerging markets.streetinsider.com
  • At 0.80% a year, an actively managed tactical strategy priced essentially at the allocation-category median.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • MATR Plain-vanilla allocation peers such as AOA and IRTR charge a fraction as much. The fee here buys the regime call, not the beta.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than in the category's giants.
  • Launched in 2023, so the regime model has a short live record, and results hinge on Harbor reading the cycle correctly.harborcapital.com

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full MATR profile⁠

ENDW vs MATR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs MATR Cost

Overpaying MATR vs ENDW

$10,788

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • MATR 0.80%

    $15,346

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • MATR 0.80%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MATR $15,346ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWMATROverpaying
10$401$1,422$1,021
20$1,561$5,393$3,832
30$4,558$15,346$10,788

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.80%MATR
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

MATR 15th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs MATR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
MATR 2.88%, better
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
MATR $0.78
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
MATR $0.78
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
MATR Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
MATR Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
MATR Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
MATRAnnual · 3 paymentsAll MATR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2023 $0.57; Dec 20, 2024 $0.55; Dec 19, 2025 $0.78. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ENDW vs MATR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025MATR 8.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025MATR 1.17
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025MATR −12.9%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61MATR 0.62

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsGMODA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsPTBDA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsRISNA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.